Longitudinal Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes in Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after 3 Years
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare yet severe complication that occurs 5 - 30 days after adenoviral vector-based vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Patients with VITT present with thrombocytopenia and venous or arterial thrombosis, in unusual locations such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). The pathophysiology of VITT involves the generation of antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4, CXCL4), forming immune complexes that activate platelets, thereby leading to thrombosis. VITT is similar to the immune-mediated drug reaction known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which presents as thrombocytopenia with an increased risk of thrombosis in patients with recent heparin administration. It has been shown that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in HIT patients typically persist for 50 to 85 days. Initial reports have shown that some patients with VITT have persistent anti-PF4 antibodies without ongoing or new clinical symptoms; however, a description of VITT antibodies and clinical symptoms after prolonged follow-up is currently lacking. In this study, we report VITT anti-PF4 antibody levels, their ability to activate platelets, and clinical outcomes from VITT patients in Canada after nearly 3 years. Methods: VITT patient follow-up samples were studied (n = 30) after a median of 23.8 months (4.2 - 35.5 months) post-vaccination with an adenoviral vector-based vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. VITT follow-up samples were tested for the presence of anti-PF4 IgG/A/M antibodies using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay [EIA; positive optical density (OD) 405nm ≥ 0.4] and tested for their functional ability to activate platelets using the PF4-serotonin release assay (SRA; positive ≥ 20% 14C-serotonin release) with increasing concentrations of exogenous human PF4. Self-reported clinical outcomes from VITT patients were also collected. Results: In our cohort of VITT patients, anti-PF4 IgG/A/M antibodies were detected in 22 out of 30 (73.3%) individuals at their most recent follow-up. Of the 22 VITT patients who tested positive for anti-PF4 antibodies, 14 (63.6%) had platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies. Clinical follow-up data were available for 8 out of the 14 (57.1%) patients with persistent platelet-activating antibodies. Among these patients, 7 out of 8 (87.5%) continued to receive anticoagulant therapy (Apixaban or Rivaroxaban; n = 5) or anti-platelet therapy (Aspirin; n = 2). There were no reported cases of recurrent thrombosis. Conclusion: The persistence of anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT contrasts with the transient nature of HIT antibodies, which typically become undetectable after 2 to 3 months following heparin administration. None of the VITT patients experienced thrombotic events despite having persistent pathogenic anti-PF4 antibodies, possibly due to continued treatment. Therefore, ongoing surveillance of VITT patients is imperative to fully understand persistent serological and clinical outcomes such as the risk of recurrent thrombosis over time.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».