Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for B-Cell Lymphomas in the Era of Novel Cellular Therapies: Experience from a Tertiary Canadian Center
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background The role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) for treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell lymphomas (BCLs) is unclear in the era of novel cellular immunotherapies. AlloHSCT can be curative for BCLs, but responses are heterogeneous across histological subtypes. Additionally, non-relapse mortality (NRM) mainly due to graft vs host disease (GVHD) limits its broad applicability. In recent years, new conditioning regimens and strategies to prevent and treat GVHD have changed the morbidity and mortality associated with transplant. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who recently received alloHSCT for BCLs to identify which patients could benefit most from alloHSCT in the era of novel therapies. Methods This is a retrospective single-center study in patients with BCLs treated with alloHSCT at Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont between January 1st 2015 and December 31rd 2023. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included NRM, relapse and incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD, cGVHD). BCLs included large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and subtypes, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and indolent BCL (iBCL) defined as follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Results 55 consecutive patients were treated with alloHSCT: 25 LBCLs (Richter transformation (RT): 10; transformed FL (tFL): 9; diffuse LBCL (DLBCL) NOS: 3; DLBCL ALK positive:1; DLBCL with MYC-BCL2 rearrangments:1; primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: 1), 16 iBCLs (FL: 15; MZL: 1), and 14 MCLs. The population was enriched for high-risk features: FLs with POD24: 43.7%; MCLs with blastoid/pleomorphic morphology or expression/mutation of P53/TP53: 42.8%. Patients had received a median of 3 (range: 1-7) prior lines of therapy and 61.8% a prior autoHSCT. No patient had received CAR-T prior to alloHSCT. Graft sources were as follows: HLA-identical (8/8) familial donor 20%, HLA-identical (8/8) unrelated donor 58%, haploidentical donor 7% and cord blood transplant 15%. Disease status remission in 88% of patients (70% complete response, 18% partial response) at time of alloHSCT. More non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning regimens were used in iBCLs (63%) compared to the LBCLs (28%) or MCLs (29%), due to the use of a planned tandem auto/alloHSCT in iBCLs (44%). Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) was used in 36%, 13%, and 29%, and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in 36%, 25%, and 42% of LBCLs, iBCLs, and MCLs, respectively. The overall 5-year PFS/OS of the entire cohort was 59.6/74.4%. After a median follow-up of 6.1, 5.8, and 2.4 years for LBCLs, iBCLs, and MCLs, their 5-year PFS/OS were 62.1/66.8%, 80.0/93.3% and estimated 39.0/68.8%, respectively. Median PFS/OS were not reached (NR) for LBCLs and iBCLs. Median PFS/OS for MCLs were 1.72 years/NR. The overall 5-year NRM was 15.8% with a relapse incidence of 24.5%. In the subgroup analysis, the 5-year NRM for LBCLs, iBCLs and MCLs were 29.2%, 6.7% and 0%, respectively. aGVHD occurred in 43.6 % of our cohort, with grade III-IV aGVHD in 18.1% of patients (no grade IV aGVHD occurred). At 3 years, the overall cGVHD incidence (moderate or severe) was 55.8% (34.5%). Conclusions Our data supports the role of alloHSCT for BCLs with particularly high and prolonged response rates in iBCLs and LBCLs, where the role of alloHSCT is being challenged with new cellular immunotherapies. A potential explanation for the impressive results seen in LBCL cases is that most originated from indolent diseases (RT/tFL) which are known to be more sensitive to the graft-vs-lymphoma effect. Although NRM remains a major challenge in alloHSCT, our results demonstrate low overall rates of NRM, which are comparable to certain series of patients who receive CAR-T cell therapy for BCLs. It is important to highlight the heterogenous nature of our population and the fact that clonal relation between RT and chronic lymphoid leukemia could not be assessed. In conclusion, alloHSCT is a potentially curative option for patients with chemosensitive BCLs and patients should be promptly referred for evaluation when indicated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».