Health-Related Quality-of-Life Improvements after Exagamglogene Autotemcel in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent Beta-Thalassemia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), an inherited hematological disorder requiring life-long, chronic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and iron chelation therapy, has a negative impact on health-related qualify of life (HRQoL). Exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel), a one-time, ex vivo, CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited, autologous cell therapy shown to eliminate the need for RBC transfusions and achieve transfusion independence, is approved for the treatment of TDT in patients ≥12 years of age. We report long-term HRQoL measures for participants with TDT after exa-cel infusion in the ongoing phase 3 CLIMB THAL-111 and CLIMB-131 studies. Methods: CLIMB THAL-111 is a 2-year, pivotal phase 3 study of a single dose of exa-cel in participants (12-35 years) with TDT who have a history of ≥100 mL/kg/year or ≥10 U/year of packed RBC transfusions for 2 years before screening. After completing CLIMB THAL-111, participants may enroll in the 13-year, long-term extension study, CLIMB-131. In both studies, changes from baseline over time for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed as a secondary endpoint. PROs for adults included EuroQol Scale 5 dimensions 5 levels of severity (EQ-5D-5L, includes descriptive system and visual analog scale [VAS]) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT, includes FACT-General [FACT-G] and bone marrow transplant subscale [BMTS]). PROs for adolescents included EuroQol Scale 5 dimensions youth (EQ-5D-Y) and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds and population norms are provided, where applicable, to contextualize clinical meaningfulness of HRQoL scores. Data are presented for participants who were followed for ≥16 months and were included in the efficacy evaluable population. Results: As of May 2024, a total of 34 adults (mean: 25.1 years; range: 18, 35) and 18 adolescents (mean: 14.6 years; range: 12, 17) in the efficacy evaluable population were followed for up to 5.3 years (median: 3.0 years, range: 1.5, 5.3) after exa-cel infusion. Clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL measures were observed across all measures and exceeded MCID thresholds, when applicable. The mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L US index score at baseline (n=34; 0.88 [0.16]) was similar to scores for the general US population norm (80.4 [15.6]) and those previously reported for adults with TDT. By Month 48, mean EQ-5D-5L health utility US index scores and mean EQ VAS scores showed substantial improvements exceeding population norms and MCID (n=5; 0.22 [0.3], MCID: 0.078; 14.2 [10.9], MCID: 7 to 10). The mean FACT-G total score improved from baseline by Month 6 and was maintained through Month 48 (n=5; 16.8 [15.7], MCID: 3 to 7), with improvements observed in all 4 subscales (physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being). Mean BMTS improved by Month 6 and was maintained through Month 48 (n=5; 7.5 [3.6], MCID: 2 to 3). For adolescents, mean EQ VAS scores improved through Month 24 (n=14; 7.3 [16.4]). The mean PedsQL total score, which includes psychosocial functioning and physical health scores, improved by Month 6 and were maintained through Month 24 (n=13; 12.2 [11.8], MCID: 4.36). Improvement in psychosocial functioning score was observed in all 3 subscales (social, emotional, school functioning). Conclusion: These results demonstrate that exa-cel provides substantial and durable clinical benefit to adults and adolescents with TDT with improvements exceeding MCID across applicable outcomes for HRQoL including physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and overall health status.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».