Mosunetuzumab Monotherapy Demonstrates Encouraging Activity and a Manageable Safety Profile in Patients with Heavily Pre-Treated Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: New treatment options are needed for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), especially those with progressive disease (PD) after Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy. Mosunetuzumab, a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, redirects T cells to eliminate B cells, including those that cause malignant disease. In a Phase I/II study (NCT02500407), mosunetuzumab demonstrated durable remissions with a manageable safety profile in pts with R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including those with R/R MCL (Budde et al. J Clin Oncol 2024). Here we report the first efficacy and safety data from an expansion cohort for mosunetuzumab monotherapy at the recommended Phase II dose in pts with MCL who are R/R to BTKi therapy. Methods: Eligible pts with MCL, R/R to ≥1 prior regimen containing a BTKi, were enrolled. Mosunetuzumab was administered intravenously in 21-day cycles with step-up dosing in Cycle (C)1 (C1 Day [D]1, 1mg; C1D8, 2mg; C1D15/C2D1, 60mg; C3D1 and onwards, 30mg). Hospitalization was not mandatory. Pts with a complete response (CR) by C8 discontinued treatment; those with a partial response or stable disease continued treatment for up to 17 cycles. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Efficacy was a secondary endpoint and was assessed by investigators according to Cheson 2007 criteria. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events were graded using the ASTCT criteria. Results: As of May 13, 2024, 25 pts were enrolled. Median age was 70 years (range: 50-89), 92% of pts had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease, 64% had ECOG performance status 1, and 84% had MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) score ≥6. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range: 2-6). All pts had ≥2 prior therapies, 80% had ≥3 prior therapies; 32% had a prior autologous stem cell transplant; 72% and 96% were refractory to a prior anti-CD20 therapy and a prior BTKi, respectively; 92% were refractory to their most recent regimen. Median number of mosunetuzumab cycles was 5 (range: 1-17), with 3 pts receiving >8 cycles. Median duration of follow-up for overall survival (OS) was 54.5 months. The best overall response rate (ORR) and CR rate were 44% and 24%, respectively. Median duration of response was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-19.5); median duration of CR was 18.0 months (95% CI: 10.3-22.3). Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.4-5.8) and median OS was 7.3 months (95% CI: 3.6-25.9). The ORR and CR rate were consistent in pts with MIPI ≥6 (n=21; ORR 43%, CR 24%); additional subgroup efficacy analyses based on Ki-67 proliferation index and blastoid/pleomorphic morphology will be presented. The most common adverse events (AEs) were CRS (52%), fatigue (36%), and pyrexia (36%). CRS events were predominantly Grade (Gr) 1/2 (48%); Gr 3 CRS occurred in 1 pt; no Gr ≥4 CRS events were reported. CRS events occurred only in C1 and all events resolved. The median duration of CRS was 3 days (range: 1‒7). In pts with CRS, 4 (31%) received tocilizumab. Suspected immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) events occurred in 3 pts (Gr 1 confusional state [n=2]; Gr 2 delirium [n=1]); 2 events occurred concurrently with CRS. All events occurred early (C1 and C2) and resolved without steroid use. Gr 3/4 AEs were reported in 19 (76%) pts; Gr 3/4 AEs occurring in ≥10% of pts included neutropenia (28%; no febrile neutropenia), hypophosphatemia (20%), thrombocytopenia (16%), and anemia (12%). Serious AEs (excluding fatal PD) occurred in 14 (56%) pts; 10 (40%) were treatment related. No Gr 5 AEs were reported (excluding PD). An AE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 1 pt (subdural haematoma; unrelated to mosunetuzumab). Conclusions: Fixed-duration mosunetuzumab demonstrated encouraging single-agent activity in a challenging-to-treat population of pts with high-risk and refractory MCL. The safety profile was manageable, characterized by predominantly low-grade CRS events confined to C1, all of which resolved. Mosunetuzumab's tolerability, off-the-shelf availability, lack of mandatory hospitalization, and convenient dosing schedule provide rationale for further exploration in this setting. Currently, mosunetuzumab is being investigated in combination with polatuzumab vedotin for pts with R/R MCL (NCT03671018).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».