Political Messaging in a Post-Truth Era: An Examination of How Conspiratorial Beliefs Influenced Electoral Outcomes in Poland Between 2015-2019
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
While this work bears only a single name, it was far from a singular effort.Indeed, almost no one can boast that they never relied on anyone, at any time, or for anything at all.Hence, it is important to always give credit where it is due, and recognize the contributions, no matter how small, of those who took the time, effort, or care in order to help others achieve their goals, and succeed where they otherwise would not.As such, I would like to recognize 3 and immortalize 3 those who lent me strength when I was weak, who fed me when I was hungry, and those who granted me the temerity to press forward when I had lost confidence in myself.This list is in no particular order, but this entire project, from its beginning to its end, would not have been possible without the tutelage of my thesis supervisor, Dr. Joan Debardeleben, Professor of political science for the European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies (EURUS) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Ontario.Dr. Debardeleben knew exactly what I needed, when I needed it: whether that was encouragement, a new idea, or a new look at an old idea, I grew to count on her advice.She was excellent with turning around edited draft chapters in rapid succession, and overall served as the whetstone by which this project could be honed into something truly remarkable.For this, and for many other things 3 thank you.Thanks also goes to Dr. MikoCaj Cze[nik, the scholar in charge of administering the PNES/PGSW survey (Polish National Election Study / Polskie Generalne Studium Wyborcze), for kindly providing the as-of-yet unpublished 2015 When discussing conspiracy theories within the context of Poland, one is perhaps inevitably drawn to the emergence of one of the most culturally significant conspiratorial narratives formed in order to explain the tragic events of 10 April 2010.Colloquially referenced as the Smoleńsk disaster or the Smoleńsk catastrophe, the loss of Polish President Lech Kaczyński and 95 other influential figures in Poland as the result of a plane crash near the Russian town of Smoleńsk shocked the nation and paralyzed it with grief.The mysterious circumstances, the fact that the Russians were in charge of the investigation, and the emotionally-charged outcome of the event, ledto the formation of many conspiracy theories to explain how and why such a tragedy could occur.Theories ranged from the plausible to the absurd, and included accusations that the Russians deployed artificial fog to obscure the runway, or that a bomb had been planted onboard the aircraft.Indeed, it has been noted that the Smoleńsk catastrophe was considered a breaking point within popular discourse in Poland, and was followed by a significant change in Polish society whereupon conspiracy theories became en vogue once more.As such, the timeframe of this study is governed by the timing of the Smoleńsk disaster and the narratives formed around it, as well as other conspiratorial narratives in circulation during the 2015 and 2019 election-cycles.Aleksandra Cichocka et al., <The Collective Conspiracy Mentality in Poland= (New York: Oxford Alois Streicher, <Truth under Attack, or the Construction of Conspiratorial Discourses after the Smoleńsk Plane Crash,= in one-by-one by means of a single shot to the back of the head.The NKVD conducted several more of these operations in the surrounding regions, and more than 25,000 Polish citizens, not only including soldiers but also members of the clergy, the intelligentsia, and other representatives of the social elite in Poland, were dispatched in much the same manner.The horrific circumstances of the massacre notwithstanding, the propagandistic abuse that followed serves to illustrate why this particular event lives in such infamy within the Polish collective memory.The mass graves in Katyń were discovered by German soldiers in 1943, in the midst of their invasion of the Soviet Union.They announced their discovery to the international public, and by placing the blame on the Soviets, hoped to use the event to marshal sympathy for their campaign and deflect from their own crimes.However, neither the United States nor the United Kingdom were interested in pursuing an investigation into the matter; for them, it was far more important to maintain the alliance with Stalin in the fight against Hitler.In fact, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, after being confronted by the Prime Minister of the Polish government-in-exile and presented with evidence that over 15,000 Polish officers had been killed by the Soviets, was reported to have remarked, <If they are dead, there is nothing that will bring them back to life...We must beat Hitler, this is not the right time for bickering and accusations.=Nevertheless, during the war, two investigative commissions were formed, one by Nazi Germany, and one Streicher, 286.Ibid, 285.Ibid, 286.PiS,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».