Still do I have a life? A Qualitative Study of Retired Citizen in Pakistan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Progressively more people are living to at least the age of 60 years and at least a quarter of the global population is expected to be 60 years or older by 2050 (United Nations, 2023). This demographic transition, driven by declining fertility rates and increased life expectancy, is accompanied by a notable trend: more people are returning to the workplace or taking up part-time jobs after retirement, which implies that the number of retirees doing so is on the rise. In the United States, about 29 percent of retirees resume work (DE Silver, 2023), and 47 percent of men aged from 60 to 64 years go back to work within the first ten years of retirement in Canada (Statistic Canada, 2023). Such changes in the social contract require that current and future advancements in post-retirement employment be analyzed and understood about antecedents and consequences of career concepts and management of human capital in organizations. There is relatively little literature published on retirement, however, the few extant literature are silent on what motivates retirees back into work and the effects on organizational performance. Therefore, this paper attempts to fill this gap by reviewing the literature on post-retirement employment, with particular emphasis on antecedents and consequences of decisions to re-employment retirees. It stresses the significance of integration and synthesis of findings for better understanding of the subject by specialists of different branches of knowledge, including sociology, psychology, and economics in the framework of HRM for the sake of improved strategic planning and policy-making. Finally, an analysis is made regarding demographic effects on workers in the organization as well as the effects of the retiring baby-boomers and the shortage of workers expected to ensue. It speaks about the possibilities of reemploying older workers as having implications to reduce workforce shortages, especially when it comes to specialized occupational positions. Last but not least; the paper sums up the social equity functions of retirees, retirees' responsibilities in family and community, and difficulties experienced in the process of retirement. Thus, the goal to expand the existing knowledge about retirees’ quality of life and the effects of work after retirement on the individual and organizational levels will be achieved through attending to the aspects identified above. Indeed, this research is valuable for enriching modern theories on career development and human resource management, and for understanding how retirees’ skills and experience can be utilized in the interest of both the employment market and the social well-being of the community.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».