MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405126172 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-201784

CD19-CAR T Cells As Definitive Consolidation for Older Adults with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission: A Pilot Study

2024· article· en· W4405126172 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ibrahim Aldoss, Xiuli Wang, Jianying Zhang, Min Guan, Ruby Espinosa, Vaibhav Agrawal, Andrew Artz, Neguine Sanani, Lior Goldberg, Teresa S. Kim, Steve Kasten, Dileshni Tilakawardane, Mary C. Clark, Jamie R. Wagner, Jinny Paul, Anthony S. Stein, Vinod Pullarkat, Amandeep Salhotra, Ahmed Aribi, Guido Marcucci, Stephen J. Forman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLymphoblastic LeukemiaMedicineAcute lymphocytic leukemiaCD19LeukemiaImmunologyInternal medicineCancer researchFlow cytometry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Older adults (>55 years) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have dismal outcomes due to adverse-risk disease biology and poor tolerability of curative therapeutic modalities. While most older adults treated with frontline low-intensity chemotherapy with or without targeted immunotherapies achieve complete remission (CR), they commonly experience subsequent relapse or treatment-related death. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is promising in advanced B-ALL, inducing high rates of durable CR. However, high pre-lymphodepletion (LD) disease burden is associated with significant CAR-T related toxicity and low durability of post-infusion CR and may limit its application in older patients (pts) with relapsed B-ALL. We hypothesized that administering CAR-T to older pts with B-ALL in first CR (CR1) would result in 1) low rates of toxicity and 2) durable CR without additional cycles of therapy. Methods: This is a pilot single-center, one-arm, non-randomized study (NCT05707273) that enrolls pts ≥55 years with B-cell ALL who achieved CR1 with any frontline therapy regardless of minimal residual disease (MRD) status and with no intention to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Eligible pts undergo autologous leukapheresis. Pts receive low intensity bridging consolidation therapy, followed by standard LD and CAR-T infusion. The primary objective is safety and tolerability. This study has a 6-pt safety lead-in (SLI) cohort on dose level (DL) 1 (200M CAR T cells). A DL -1 is implemented if dose limiting toxicity (DLT)/unacceptable toxicity (UT) occurs in >33% pts in the SLI. We use our memory-enriched CAR-T (Aldoss I et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2022). Once the recommended phase 2 dosing (RP2D) is identified, an additional 9 pts are enrolled on an expansion cohort. Pts are followed for toxicity and MRD relapse by flow cytometry (FC) and clonoSEQ (if feasible) every 3 months. Pts with Ph+ disease are eligible to receive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as maintenance therapy after day 60 post CAR-T infusion. Results: We treated 6 pts in the SLI, none of whom experienced DLT/UT. DL1 was declared the RP2D and the expansion cohort was opened. To date (July 18, 2024), we have enrolled 16 pts, 2 of whom were ineligible either due to toxicity pre-leukapheresis or CD19- relapse pre-LD, 13 of whom received CAR-T (11 completed the 28-day DLT period, 2 actively in the DLT period) and 1of whom will undergo leukapheresis by the time of submission. For the infused pts (n=13), the median age was 66 yrs (range: 55-79); 7 were male. Five pts had Ph+, 2 had TP53m, 1 each had CRLF2r Ph-like, KMT2Ar, EP300::ZNF384, TCF3::PBX1, CDKN2A deletion and trisomy 5. Ten (77%) pts received blinatumomab as part of initial therapy. All patients were in MRD- CR by FC pre-LD. Among pts who completed the DLT period (n=11), 7 (64%) experienced transient grade (G) 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that resolved with tocilizumab +/- corticosteroid. No pt developed immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) or ≥G2 CRS. The first pt with Ph- ALL is >14 months follow up post CAR-T and remains in MRD- CR by clonoSEQ without additional therapy. Four Ph+ ALL pts began TKI maintenance therapy 60 days post CAR-T. With a median follow up of 175 days (range: 44-443) for pts who completed the DLT period, only 1 pt with Ph+ ALL has developed molecular relapse (negative flow) at 6 months while on TKI maintenance. This pt remains alive and in CR after changing TKI and receiving alloHCT. All other pts are in MRD- CR. There have been no deaths thus far on this study. Despite the low antigen setting (MRD- CR) pre-LD, CAR T cells expanded in vivo, peaking on days 7-14 (mean peak, 14%±3.6%; range, 0.88-36.5%) in the CD3+ population; CAR T cells were observed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in all 10 pts who had a lumbar puncture evaluation on day 28 (median, 0.28x103/ml; range: 0.04-25.3x103/ml). Among evaluable patients, baseline and day 100 walk speed and cognitive function were similar (mean walk speed 0.71 vs 0.72 meter/second; mean Montreal cognitive assessments of 25 vs 27, respectively). Conclusion: The use of CAR-T in older adults with B-ALL in CR1 appears safe with no observed ICANS or ≥G2 CRS. CAR T cells had a robust expansion in the blood and CSF despite the low antigen setting. We have observed preliminary durable remissions and pts maintained function and cognition on day 100 post CAR-T.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,319
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,827

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207