Reckoning, Repairing, and Reworlding as Praxis (Editors' Outro)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
lockdown.The texts we were reading, along with the circumstances we were living, raised questions about the intersections of multiple crises, and required us, as our work proceeded, to navigate further and compounding emergencies.It was impossible to disaggregate our academic selves and concomitant commitments from the roles that each of us plays in other spheres, and the obligations that entailed therein.Together we sought ways to prioritize where our respective energies and points of focus would be best directed, and to support one another, as well as the larger project and all the people involved in its realization (our contributors, our peer reviewers, the Editorial Board of Studies in Social Justice) as we moved forward.We were not always successful in achieving or sustaining the balance we aspired to strike, but we all see the value of learning by trial-and-error.Our process drew sustenance from the series of workshops we facilitated during annual Canadian Association of Postcolonial Studies (CAPS) conferences: "Re-placing Literature: Mobilizing Emergent Strategy to Decolonize our Institutional Practices" (2022); "Alter-modes of Scholarly and Creative Practice" (2023); and "Beyond the Toxic University: Towards Connection, Kinship, and Care" (2024).In 2024, the CAPS gathering was held away from the McGill University campus in Montreal, following the Association's decision to withdraw from the Congress gathering in support of striking Law Faculty at McGill, and in protest against McGill's complicity with the police, who used tear gas on student protesters in the Gaza solidarity encampments.Our workshop addressed that context of institutional violence along with the softer brutalities of humanities work that this issue set out to explore.In addition to generating inspiring insights from all the participants, all three workshops nurtured our connections with one another as collective members, confirming our sense of the importance of embodied knowledge and conviviality.These workshops aside, we have never met in person as an entire collective because our members are situated across seven different time zones.This "Outro," then, began as a Zoom conversation, the mode of all of our meetings.The discussion was based on a few prompts that we had circulated in advance to generate a shared reflection on the work we have done, and included the following questions:1. How has your thinking about our three guiding terms -reckoning, repairing, reworlding -evolved over the course of our collaboration?2. To what extent and in what ways, on a micro-scale, were we able to work towards enacting these practices as we worked with one another, and also with our contributors, our peer reviewers, and the journal's editorial board?What obstacles kept us from doing so, or made the effort more challenging?3. What were the benefits and drawbacks of working collaboratively, and what made us lose certain people along the way?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».