(158) A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFICACY OF GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Some studies suggest the use of group psychotherapy (GP) as an effective treatment for female sexual dysfunctions (FSDs). GP allows a rich exchange of experiences that would not be achieved through individual care. This treatment modality also gives people in vulnerable situations the opportunity for low-cost psychotherapy. Although GP are indicated in multiple fields of health for the treatment of different pathologies, no literature reviews have investigated the effects of GP for the treatment of FSDs or compared the effectiveness of group interventions with other types of interventions (e.g., medication or individual psychotherapy). Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of GP in the treatment of FSDs. The secondary goals are to assess (1) which are the main FSDs treated through GP; (2) the main GP approaches and (3) the main countries where GP was used. Methods A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Using six scientific databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus. The eligibility criteria were studies that included women ≥18 years old with an established diagnosis of any FSD or any level of sexual dysfunction (SD); at least one group received GP; the intervention was delivered by health professionals; have comparison of GP with itself (pre-post) or comparison of GP with any other type of treatment; the study was a randomized (RCT) or non-randomized (NRCT) controlled trial; and studies that had some type of statistical evidence of efficacy (e.g., Cohen’s d,) or sufficient data to perform effect size calculation of the intervention. Results Initially, 615 articles were found, but only 14 studies remained after the application of the criteria. The included articles spanned a wide time frame, from 1978 to 2022. The majority (n = 10) were published between 2014 and 2022. Most of the studies were RCTs (n = 8). Almost half (n = 6) of the papers were conducted in Canada, followed by Iran, the USA, the Netherlands, and Brazil, with two studies in each country. Sexual function (SF) was the most analyzed (n = 10), followed by pain during intercourse (n = 4). Vulvar pain and sexual interest/arousal disorder were assessed by three studies. Our findings suggest that for SF enhancement, GCBT and MBGT are the most used GP, with robust evidence of effectiveness. Other psychological approaches based on CBT, such as bibliotherapy, have also shown moderate effect sizes. Conclusions Our findings corroborate previous studies which suggest that the use of CBT and MBCT for the treatment of FSDs reduces anxiety levels, improving the positive attitude toward sexual health and, consequently. GCBT and MBGT have both shown medium to large effect sizes in improving female sexual function. Medium to large effect sizes were also found during the treatment of vulvar pain and pain during intercourse with GCBT. Only MGGT showed a significant effect size for low desire treatment. MBGT was the most used and effective intervention for the treatment of sexual interest/arousal disorder. Disclosure No.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».