Pelvic floor muscle activation amplitude at rest, during voluntary contraction, and during Valsalva maneuver—a comparison between those with and without provoked vestibulodynia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The neuromuscular contribution to increased tone of the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) observed among those with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is unclear. AIM: To determine if PFM activity differs between those with provoked PVD and pain free controls, and if the extent of PFM activation at rest or during activities is associated with pain sensitivity at the vulvar vestibule, psychological, and/or psychosexual outcomes. METHODS: This observational case-control study included forty-two volunteers with PVD and 43 controls with no history of vulvar pain. Participants completed a series of questionnaires to evaluate pain, pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety and stress, and sexual function, then underwent a single laboratory-based assessment to determine their pressure pain threshold at the vulvar vestibule and electromyographic (EMG) signal amplitudes recorded from three PFMs (pubovisceralis, bulbocavernosus, and external anal sphincter). OUTCOMES: EMG signal amplitude recorded at rest, during maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and during maximal effort Valsalva maneuver, pressure pain threshold at the vulvar vestibule, and patient-reported psychological (stress, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, central sensitization) and psychosexual (sexual function) outcomes. RESULTS: Participants with PVD had higher activation compared to controls in all PFMs studied when at rest and during Valsalva maneuver. There were no group differences in EMG amplitude recorded from the pubovisceralis during MVC (Cohen's d = 0.11), but greater activation was recorded from the bulbocavernosus (d = 0.67) and the external anal sphincter(d = 0.54) among those with PVD. When EMG amplitudes at rest and on Valsalva were normalized to activation during MVC, group differences were no longer evident, except at the pubovisceralis, where tonic EMG amplitude was higher among those with PVD (d = 0.42). While those with PVD had lower vulvar pressure pain thresholds than controls, there were no associations between PFM EMG amplitude and vulvar pain sensitivity nor psychological or psychosexual problems. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Women with PVD demonstrate evidence of PFM overactivity, yet the extent of EMG activation is not associated with vulvar pressure pain sensitivity nor psychological/psychosexual outcomes. Interventions aimed at reducing excitatory neural drive to these muscles may be important for successful intervention. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study includes a robust analysis of PFM EMG. The analysis of multiple outcomes may have increased the risk statistical error, however the results of hypothesis testing were consistent across the three PFMs studied. The findings are generalizable to those with PVD without vaginismus. CONCLUSIONS: Those with PVD demonstrate higher PFM activity in the bulbocavernosus, pubovisceralis, and external anal sphincter muscles at rest, during voluntary contraction (bulbocavernosus and external anal sphincter) and during Valsalva maneuver; yet greater activation amplitude during these tasks is not associated with greater vulvar pressure pain sensitivity nor psychological or psychosexual function.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».