Abundance ties: Nephele and the globular cluster population accreted with <i>ω</i> Cen
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Context. The peculiar Galactic globular cluster ω Centauri (NGC 5139) has drawn attention for its unique features, such as an unusually high stellar mass compared to other Galactic globular clusters and a broad distribution of chemical elements. These features have led to the hypothesis that ω Centauri might be the nuclear remnant of an ancient dwarf galaxy accreted by the Milky Way, potentially bringing along its own globular cluster system. Aims. In this work, we adopt an innovative approach by examining the individual chemical abundances of Galactic globular clusters to identify shared patterns with ω Centauri. Methods. Applying Gaussian mixture models to globular cluster stars, whose membership is based on the analysis of the Gaia EDR3 release, and whose chemical abundances have been obtained from APOGEE DR17, we depart from traditional kinematic-based procedures and search for globular clusters that are chemically compatible with ω Centauri in an eight-dimensional space defined by [Fe/H], α-elements such as [Mg/Fe], [Si/Fe], and [Ca/Fe], light+odd-Z elements such as [C/Fe], [Al/Fe], and [K/Fe], and an iron-peak element as [Mn/Fe]. With this approach, clusters that are chemically compatible with ω Centauri are clusters whose chemical patterns are contained in the abundance domain defined by ω Centauri stars. Results. Our analysis leads to the identification of six globular clusters – NGC 6752, NGC 6656, NGC 6809, NGC 6273, NGC 6205, and NGC 6254 – that exhibit strong chemical similarities with ω Centauri, and that have metallicities that coincide with those of the two known peaks (primary and secondary) of ω Centauri’s metallicity distribution. They all exhibit non-null intrinsic [Fe/H] dispersions, ranging between 0.07 and 0.12 dex, unless the ASPCAP uncertainties had been severely underestimated, and three of them have statistically significant skewed [Fe/H] distributions. Furthermore, the chemical patterns of these clusters lead to the exclusion that they were formed in progenitor galaxies with chemical enrichment histories similar to those of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, Sagittarius, and Fornax. Once placed in kinematic spaces such as the energy – angular momentum plane, these clusters result scatter across an extended region, which is predicted by N-body simulations if their common progenitor was sufficiently massive compared to the Milky Way. Conclusions. Our novel approach suggests a common origin for NGC 6752, NGC 6656, NGC 6809, NGC 6273, NGC 6205, NGC 6254, and ω Centauri, indicating that Nephele, as we propose to call the progenitor in which all these clusters formed, played a substantial role in the Galaxy’s history. The finding that a set of globular clusters can be associated with ω Centauri reinforces the hypothesis that this system is the remnant of a galaxy, and not simply an unusual globular cluster. This study also shows that the spectroscopic data at our disposal have reached the quality needed to compare chemical patterns of stellar systems, to reveal their common origins or exclude their association with specific progenitor galaxies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».