Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2023, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics has maintained a top impact factor (16.3) that places the Journal as fourth in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Psychiatry ranking and fourth in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) Psychology ranking. Notably, in the SSCI Psychology ranking, the three journals preceding Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics are entirely concerned with review articles (thus more likely to be cited). This means that Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics currently is the top journal among those publishing original investigations in psychology.In the last decades, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics has been characterized by a strong clinical orientation [1, 2] and continues to seek innovative and original investigations that may open new perspectives at the interface between medicine and behavioral sciences, as well as both critical and systematic review articles of high intellectual content. The Journal supports the pluralism of viewpoints and deals with a broad range of clinical issues, particularly at an interdisciplinary level, related to assessment [3] and treatment in psychiatry and psychology, with special regard to psychotherapy [4, 5], psychosomatic medicine [6‒8], clinical pharmacopsychology [9, 10], and clinimetrics [11‒13]. Above all, a major determinant of selection is “the clinical factor” [14] of submitted papers, i.e., the degree and the extent to which an article provides information to the clinician that may improve his/her practice. We pursue the intellectual richness that only clinical practice can yield. The Journal’s unique identity is also the result of the blending of methodological rigor [15, 16] and innovation.As Editors-in-Chief, we would like to acknowledge here the collaboration between Karger’s editorial office and the Assistant Editors (Marcella Lucente and Chiara Patierno), the invaluable support of the Editorial Board members and statistical consultants, the help of many external reviewers (listed below) who dedicated their time and efforts to assess and improve the quality of submitted manuscripts and the unique advice of the Honorary Editor, Prof. Giovanni A. Fava.The following experts have supplemented the Editorial Board by reviewing the manuscripts submitted to Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics during 2024 and are gratefully acknowledged: F. Aardema (Montreal, QC, Canada), P. Arvilommi (Helsinki, Finland), A. T. F. Beekman (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), G. Benasi (New York, NY, USA), M. O. Bertelli (Florence, Italy), M. Bohus (Mannheim, Germany), R. Bryant (Sydney, NSW, Australia), K. S. Christensen (Aarhus, Denmark), B. F. Dear (Sydney, NSW, Australia), D. Ehrmann (Bad Mergentheim, Germany), A. Evers (Leiden, The Netherlands), T. Favorite (Ann Arbor, MI, USA), J. de Figueiredo (New Haven, CT, USA), F. Galli (Rome, Italy), S. Gostoli (Bologna, Italy), P. Haffner (Berlin, Germany), T. H. Hoppen (Münster, Germany), R. Hurlemann (Bad Zwischenahn, Germany), M. P. Hyett (Bentley, WA, Australia), T. Karatzias (Edinburgh, UK), T. Krieger (Bern, Switzerland), T. M. C. Lee (Hong Kong, Hong Kong), F. Leichsenring (Giessen, Germany), P. Leombruni (Turin, Italy), B. Löwe (Hamburg, Germany), C. Martin-Soelch (Fribourg, Switzerland), P. M. McEvoy (Bentley, WA, Australia), A. E. Nardi (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), K. Rickels (Gladwyne, PA, USA), W. Rief (Marburg, Germany), G. Rodin (Toronto, ON, Canada), N. Sasaki (Tokyo, Japan), M. Schiele (Freiburg, Germany), B. Sheaves (Oxford, UK), E. Silberman (Boston, MA, USA), J. Vittengl (Kirksville, MO, USA), M. Woud (Göttingen, Germany), D. Yao (Chengdu, China), T. Yuan (Shanghai, China), and B. Zhu (Beijing, China).Both external reviewers and Editorial Board members have disclosed potential conflicts of interest. The Editors-in-Chief, the Honorary Editor, and the Assistant Editors have no conflict of interests to declare for 2024.The authors have no funding to declare.Jenny Guidi and Fiammetta Cosci equally contributed to drafting and revising the manuscript.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».