Letter to Editor From McCarroll et al: “Approach to the Patient: Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Editor, We commend Liu et al, for their clear and comprehensive review of normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NPHPT) (1). One of the most important considerations in diagnosing NPHPT is the exclusion of other causes of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). While loop diuretics are known to cause SHPT, Liu et al report that thiazide diuretics are associated with elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH), though they point out that studies are conflicting. However, the evidence for thiazides causing elevations in PTH is sparse and we are inclined to agree with other authors that they should not be considered PTH-inducing drugs (2). The largest and most recent observational study (n = 4139) published this year, but not referenced by Liu et al, found no increased risk of SHPT in thiazide users, including in a subset (n = 2612) without significant chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min) (3). Another observational study involving 1888 individuals identified lower PTH levels in thiazide users (4). Most compelling are the results of 2 double-blind randomized controlled trials in healthy postmenopausal women. One study (n = 265) identified no change in PTH after treatment with low-dose thiazides over 3 years while another (n = 188) found no change with high-dose thiazides over 2 years (5). Other small intervention trials identified no effect of thiazides on PTH, as previously reported (2, 4). While a small study identified an initial rise in PTH in postmenopausal women after thiazide initiation, this was only a 7-day trial and levels approached baseline at the end of the study (2). Several studies of patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria and some with primary hyperparathyroidism have also shown that thiazides lowered or had no effect on PTH levels (4). In the clinical case presented by Liu et al (1), SHPT in a patient on a thiazide diuretic also resolved after correcting low calcium intake. One medication not mentioned that may increase the risk of SHPT are proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (4). A recent large observational study identified an increased risk of SHPT in users of PPIs who were taking calcium supplements (3). PPIs inhibit gastric acid secretion, which is required for the absorption of calcium carbonate (the most common form of calcium in supplements). To optimize absorption, calcium carbonate should be taken with food; however, calcium citrate, whose absorption is unaffected by gastric acid, may be preferable for PPI users with elevated PTH despite having no other causes for SHPT (6). Finally, one concern regarding the diagnosis of NPHPT that was not raised is the reliability of assays used to measure PTH. Immunoassays for PTH are susceptible to interference from heterophile antibodies and other proteins, with considerable variations between platforms (7). For this reason, it has been recommended to measure PTH using a different assay in cases of NPHPT with persistently elevated levels after excluding other causes (8). The authors have nothing to disclose. normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism proton pump inhibitors parathyroid hormone secondary hyperparathyroidism
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,036 | 0,028 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».