MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Longitudinal Follow-Up of the Psychological Well-Being of Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of PICO-SM

2024· article· en· 1 citations· W4405282358 sur OpenAlex· 10.3390/curroncol31120582

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Revue canadienneIl a paru dans une revue canadienne.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : venue_new · poids de sondage : 2684.25 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Longitudinal study of psychological well-being in colorectal cancer patients; a clinical question.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

This longitudinal study examines psychological well-being among cancer patients rather than research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Longitudinal clinical study of psychological well-being in colorectal cancer patients during COVID-19.

Résumé

PICO-SM was a prospective longitudinal study investigating the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with colorectal cancer treated in a large UK tertiary cancer centre. Here, we present the impact of the third wave of the pandemic (December 2021 to February 2022), when the Omicron variant became prevalent in the UK, and the complete longitudinal comparison across the entire duration of this study. Patients were invited to complete a questionnaire, including screening psychometric tools. In total, n = 312 patients were included in the final analysis. Specifically, in this Omicron-predominant wave, n = 96 patients were studied in detail: the mean age was 64 years, 64% were male, 33% reported poor well-being, 27% anxiety, 11% depressive symptoms, and 3% trauma-related symptoms. The participants who had investigations cancelled (OR 9.22, 95% CI 1.09–77.85; p = 0.041) or felt that the pandemic would affect their mental health (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.96–7.44; p < 0.001) had an increased risk of anxiety according to a multivariate analysis. Similarly, independent predictors of poor well-being included concern that the pandemic would affect their cancer treatment (OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.03–20.56; p = 0.046) or mental health (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.38–11.03; p = 0.010). The psychological distress experienced by patients, particularly anxiety, remained high during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These results align with our previously reported findings, emphasising the importance of continuing cancer treatment amidst an ongoing humanitarian emergency.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Current Oncology
Thématique
Cancer survivorship and care
Domaine
Medicine
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Servier
Mots-clés
MedicineColorectal cancerOncologyInternal medicineCancerFamily medicine
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui