MétaCan
← all works

Longitudinal Follow-Up of the Psychological Well-Being of Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of PICO-SM

2024· article· en· 1 citations· W4405282358 on OpenAlex· 10.3390/curroncol31120582

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: venue_new · design weight: 2684.25 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Longitudinal study of psychological well-being in colorectal cancer patients; a clinical question.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

This longitudinal study examines psychological well-being among cancer patients rather than research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Longitudinal clinical study of psychological well-being in colorectal cancer patients during COVID-19.

Abstract

PICO-SM was a prospective longitudinal study investigating the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with colorectal cancer treated in a large UK tertiary cancer centre. Here, we present the impact of the third wave of the pandemic (December 2021 to February 2022), when the Omicron variant became prevalent in the UK, and the complete longitudinal comparison across the entire duration of this study. Patients were invited to complete a questionnaire, including screening psychometric tools. In total, n = 312 patients were included in the final analysis. Specifically, in this Omicron-predominant wave, n = 96 patients were studied in detail: the mean age was 64 years, 64% were male, 33% reported poor well-being, 27% anxiety, 11% depressive symptoms, and 3% trauma-related symptoms. The participants who had investigations cancelled (OR 9.22, 95% CI 1.09–77.85; p = 0.041) or felt that the pandemic would affect their mental health (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.96–7.44; p < 0.001) had an increased risk of anxiety according to a multivariate analysis. Similarly, independent predictors of poor well-being included concern that the pandemic would affect their cancer treatment (OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.03–20.56; p = 0.046) or mental health (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.38–11.03; p = 0.010). The psychological distress experienced by patients, particularly anxiety, remained high during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These results align with our previously reported findings, emphasising the importance of continuing cancer treatment amidst an ongoing humanitarian emergency.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
Current Oncology
Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Funders
Servier
Keywords
MedicineColorectal cancerOncologyInternal medicineCancerFamily medicine
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes