“It's like it's the old boys club”—the age‐related experiences of diverse older women living with <scp>HIV</scp>: A scoping review and consultative exercise
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: HIV is often under-recognized in older individuals, particularly women, despite a significant number of new cases being diagnosed in those aged >50 years. This review aimed to understand the age-related experiences and challenges faced by women aged ≥50 years living with HIV through an intersectional perspective. METHODS: We conducted a systematic scoping review using the framework by Arksey and O'Malley, refined by Levac, Colquhoun, and Peters, and informed by a Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis Plus (SGBA+) approach. The research questions were developed in consultation with community advisory stakeholders. A comprehensive search strategy was used, targeting categories related to 'aged,' 'HIV,' and 'women' based on scoping review and Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies guidelines. We included peer-reviewed studies where at least 50% of participants were women aged ≥50 years and living with HIV, focusing on their age-related experiences in health or social contexts. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion criteria through a two-level screening process. Data extraction included details on publication type, study characteristics, participant recruitment, and results. Findings were synthesized and presented to a stakeholder advisory committee for additional insights. Stakeholder input from an advisory committee was incorporated into the findings, providing additional context and enhancing the interpretation of the results. RESULTS: The review included 21 articles. Key findings revealed the intersectional challenges faced by women aged ≥50 years living with HIV, such as stigma, emotional resilience, social support networks, and health management strategies. These findings highlight the complex interplay of factors influencing their lives, from concerns about sharing HIV status to strategies for managing health. The review also identified research gaps and underscored the need for comprehensive studies on the intersectional dynamics affecting health outcomes in this population. CONCLUSIONS: This review underscores the complex challenges and strengths of women aged ≥50 years living with HIV, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions and support services that recognize their intersecting identities and unique needs. Addressing these issues is essential for ensuring equitable access to care and fostering resilience within this community.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».