Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Using Circulating Immunomodulatory Proteins
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background/Objectives: The leading cause of death for people with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including heart attacks and strokes. However, research into biomarkers that could help predict MACE in patients with PAD has been limited. Immunomodulatory proteins are known to significantly influence systemic atherosclerosis, suggesting they could be useful prognostic indicators for MACE in patients with PAD. In this study, we evaluated a broad panel of immunomodulatory proteins to identify those linked to MACE in individuals with PAD. Methods: We conducted a prognostic study involving a prospectively recruited cohort of 406 patients consisting of 254 with PAD and 152 without PAD. At the baseline, we measured the plasma concentrations of 17 circulating immunomodulatory proteins and followed the cohort for two years. The primary outcome was 2-year MACE, a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. Plasma protein concentrations were compared between patients with PAD with and without 2-year MACE using Mann–Whitney U tests. We further examined the prognostic potential of differentially expressed proteins through a Cox proportional hazards analysis, determining their independent associations with 2-year MACE while controlling for all the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including the existing coronary artery and cerebrovascular diseases. Additionally, A Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the 2-year freedom from MACE in patients with low versus high levels of the differentially expressed proteins based on the median plasma concentrations. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 68.8 years (SD 11.1), with 134 patients (33%) being female. During the two-year follow-up, 63 individuals (16%) developed MACE. The following proteins were significantly elevated in patients with PAD who experienced 2-year MACE compared to those who did not: galectin-1 (0.17 [SD 0.06] vs. 0.10 [SD 0.07] pg/mL, p = 0.012), alpha-1-microglobulin (16.68 [SD 7.48] vs. 14.74 [SD 6.71] pg/mL, p = 0.019), and galectin-9 (0.14 [SD 0.09] vs. 0.09 [SD 0.05] pg/mL, p = 0.033). The Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that these three proteins were independently associated with 2-year MACE after adjusting for all the baseline demographic and clinical factors: galectin-1 (HR 1.45 [95% CI 1.09–1.92], p = 0.019), alpha-1-microglobulin (HR 1.31 [95% CI 1.06–1.63], p = 0.013), and galectin-9 (HR 1.35 [95% CI 1.02–1.78], p = 0.028). Over the two-year follow-up, patients with higher levels of galectin-1, galectin-9, and alpha-1-microglobulin had a lower freedom from MACE. Additional analysis showed that these three proteins were not significantly associated with 2-year MACE in patients without PAD. Conclusions: Among the 17 immunomodulatory proteins evaluated, galectin-1, galectin-9, and alpha-1-microglobulin were found to be independently and specifically associated with 2-year MACE in patients with PAD. Assessing the plasma concentrations of these proteins can aid in risk stratification for MACE in patients with PAD, helping to inform clinical decisions regarding multidisciplinary referrals to cardiologists, neurologists, and vascular medicine specialists. This information can also guide the aggressiveness of medical management, ultimately improving cardiovascular outcomes for patients with PAD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».