Factors Influencing Safe Return-to-Play Recommendations Following Sports Injuries Assessed in Urgent Care Centers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Significant focus has been directed toward the alarming incidence rates of sports injuries and traumatic injuries associated with sports participation, particularly in the pediatric and young adult population. Anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries occur in nearly 40 per 100,000 adolescents aged 5–18. From 2009 to 2010, approximately 2.6 million cases were treated in emergency departments or urgent care centers among the 29.2 million pediatric patients involved in sports and recreational activities. The ramifications of these injuries have long-term financial and functional impacts on the affected athletes. Patients are at a seven-fold greater risk of sustaining a second ACL injury, and 70% develop knee osteoarthritis as early as 10 to 15 years post-injury. Amendments to the provisions of athlete safety, such as the passage of return-to-play laws in all 50 United States, encourage comprehensive protocols that protect growing athletes from premature return to play after sustaining sport-related concussion injuries. However, limitations with the content and enforcement of these laws, along with societal pressures and mixed messaging, factor into the decision-making process for optimal management and safe return to play following all sports injuries. Methods: Here we present additional methods aimed at helping readers understand the study data, with particular emphasis on study methods, detailed statistical approaches, and processes specific to the determination of the dependent variables. This study is part of a larger project with the aim of observing TBI and other sports injuries in UCs in the Western Swedish County during high seasons for different sports and describing recovery progress. To comply with imperative guidelines for handling personal information, data from subtype injuries (other than TBI) were not used. Data collection occurred from 2014-2018 using a smartphone app for reporting visits regarding specific injuries. The app had a minimal impact and was implemented through briefings and regular reminders. Non-identifiable data from the Electronic Health Records were collected at the outpatient clinic. Foster visits were added for injuries with progress assessments. Conclusion: In conclusion, RICE and other factors influenced whether injury victims were advised to stop play or return to play at this check-in point. Specific sports injuries may benefit from the restriction of some activities while undergoing more examination before making sport-specific recommendations. Reliable and valid continuing education may achieve best practices through peer behavior modeling. This could be disseminated to all providers of care for otherwise healthy sport participants. Delineation of which healthcare providers sport participants seek out, the conditions they want to know about, and their readiness to learn in order to better advise sport participants on a healthy return to play should be examined. The advisability of follow-up care in a specialty sports treatment facility or with a specialist in these injuries, the use of telehealth, and other issues should be explored in future studies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».