Systematic review of school-based studies for the prevention and management of childhood obesity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Overweight and obesity rates have reached epidemic proportions and are still escalating. In the domain of childhood obesity prevention and management the school plays a vital role, due to its pedagogical position and exposure (1) . The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review examining the effectiveness, barriers and facilitators in school-based prevention and management interventions on childhood overweight and obesity. The search criteria were, overweight and obese, 2-19 years old, school-based RCTs, no intervention, and change in overweight and obesity parameters (e.g., prevalence, BMI, waist circumference). Additional eligibility criteria were peer-reviewed articles published in the last 10 years, conducted in Europe, Canada, USA, or Oceania. The selection and data collection process were carried out by two reviewers and disagreements settled by a third. The clinical and statistical heterogeneity of studies lead to an analysis based on themes of recurring methods. The heterogeneity also resulted in that only the direction of the result could be analysed, with results reported as having a positive, negative, or inconclusive effect on the population based on the statistical tests performed. If a secondary obesity parameter showed a different effect direction it was noted as a contradicting result. Of 8725 unique articles identified, 76 fulfilled the selection criteria. Two dimensions (nutrition and physical activity) with three intended mediators (knowledge, behaviour training, and environment) of interventions were identified. Thirty-eight studies were conducted in Europe, 32 in North America, and 6 in Oceania. The median age of participants was 10.8 years. The median sex distribution of participants was 50.5%. Seventytwo percent of studies were cluster randomised at school level, and the rest on class or region. Only 22% of studies were blinded and the mean retention rate was 83.1%. In nutrition, the most common interventions included a teaching component (n = 29), or both a teaching and behaviour component (n = 24). In physical activity, the most common intervention included a behavioural component (n = 33), followed by knowledge only (n = 22) and knowledge and behaviour (n = 18). From the summative analyses performed on the main outcome variable of each intervention, 61% of all intervention arms had a positive effect, ranging from 54% to 70%. Five percent had a negative effect, ranging from 0% to 10%. Of the interventions that had a positive effect 50% displayed contradicting results from other obesity markers, ranging from 6% to 44%. Of single components, environment was most effective for nutrition and least effective for physical activity. Too few studies had negative findings to warrant an analysis. Contradicting results were most frequent for the environmental component of the nutrition dimension. Interventions targeting physical activity and nutrition can be effective in preventing and managing overweight and obesity. Depending on the intended mediator and number of mediators results may vary.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».