Using Relational Biology with Loop Analysis to Study the North Atlantic Biological Carbon Pump in a ‘Hybrid’ Non-Algorithmic Manner
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Biologists, philosophers, and mathematicians building upon Robert Rosen’s non-algorithmic theories of life using Relational Biology and Category Theory have continued to develop his theory and modeling approaches. There has been general agreement that the impredicative, self-referential, and complex nature of living systems negates an algorithmic approach. Rosen’s main goal was to answer, “What is Life?”. Many believe he provided the best but minimum answer using a cellular, metabolism–repair or (M, R)-system as a category-theoretic model. It has been challenging, however, to incorporate his theory to develop a fully non-algorithmic methodology that retains the essence of his thinking while creating more operational models of living systems that can be used to explore other facets of life and answer different questions. Living systems do more than the minimum in the real world beyond the confines of definition alone. For example, ecologists ask how living systems inherently mitigate existential risk from climate change and biodiversity loss through their complex self-organization. Loop Analysis, a signed graph technique, is discussed as a hybrid algorithmic/non-algorithmic methodology in Relational Biology. This methodology can be used at the ecosystem level with standard non-algorithmic field data as per McAllister’s description of the algorithmic incompressibility of empirical data of this type. An example is described showing how the North Atlantic Carbon Pump, an important planetary life support system, is situated in the plankton community and functions as a mutualistic ecosystem chimera. It captures carbon from the atmosphere as an extended (M, R)-system and processes it until it is sequestered in the marine sediments. This is an important process to alleviate climate change in magnitude equal to or larger than the sequestration of carbon on land with forests. It is suggested that the ecosystem level should replace the cellular and organismic levels as the main system unit in biology and evolution since all life exists and evolves with full functional potential in ecosystem networks and not laboratory test tubes. The plankton ecosystem is the largest after the total biosphere and consists of evolutionary links and relationships that have existed for eons of time. If there was ever a genuine robust, highly self-organized ecosystem, it would be planktonic. Severing the links in these thermodynamically open networks by focusing on lower levels of the biological hierarchy loses the critical organization of how life exists on this planet. There is no theory to regain this crucial ‘omitted’ ecological relational causality at the cell or organismal levels. At the end of the paper, some future directions are outlined.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».