HBV Catch-up Vaccination in Children and Adults with Incomplete or Unknown Vaccination to Reduce Hepatitis B-related Morbidity: A Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Hepatitis B virus causes life-threatening chronic liver infection and increases the risk of death from cirrhosis and liver cancer. A three-dose series of universal HBV vaccination initiated from birth is effective against the disease. It is unclear if catch-up vaccination is also effective in those with incomplete or no HBV vaccination. Objective: To review the evidence on the effect of HBV catch-up vaccination on children and adults to decrease HBV-related morbidity. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, ChinaXiv, MedRXIV, BioRXIV, Google Scholar, and ongoing and completed trials on USA: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; China: http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojen.aspx, and WHO: https://www.who.int/clinical-trials-registry-platform. The last search date was 30 June 2023. We considered experimental or observational studies, meta-analysis/systematic reviews, completed trials and preprints that investigated the efficacy of catch-up HBV immunization in decreasing morbidity from hepatitis B infection including acute and chronic hepatitis B infection, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. There was no age and language restriction. Two reviewers independently rated the quality of included studies using Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach was used to determine the certainty of evidence. Data was presented as number (%) for categorical values. Differences between the unvaccinated and vaccinated group was described as relative risk or odds ratio for categorical variables. Data was pooled using Review Manager 5.4. Results: A total of four observational studies were included, one of which had data in children and adults [two (one with data in adults) studies in children; 3 in adults]. The cross-sectional study was assessed as good quality; and the three cohorts as fair to good. In children, a high certainty evidence study showed that catch up vaccination in 9 to 18 years old decreased risk of HBsAg positivity [RR: 0.09 (0.004, 0.21)], reduced HBV DNA detection [RR: 0.084 (0.026, 0.273)], and increased anti-HBs seroconversion [RR: 2.08 (1.84, 2.33)]. The quality of evidence was deemed high based on a large treatment effect. Another low certainty evidence study in Italy showed that HBV mass immunization in 0-10 years old decreased the prevalence of HBsAg anti-HBc and increased anti-HBs seroconversion after vaccination. In adults, three low certainty evidence studies were included. Two studies showed decreased incidence of acute hepatitis B [OR: 0.08 (0.05, 0.12), I2 = 33%]. Another study demonstrated a decreased prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma with HBV vaccination with the incidence ratio of vaccinated with chronically infected at 0.04 (0.02, 0.07) showing a large magnitude of benefit for vaccination against HCC when chronic HBV infection is prevented. The studies were deemed to have low quality due to issue of directness and study design. Conclusion: HBV catch-up vaccination in adults is effective in decreasing the prevalence of acute hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma. It likewise decreased the prevalence of HBsAg and anti-HBc, and provided anti-HBs protection in 0 to 18 years.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,027 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,013 | 0,011 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».