MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405673591 · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0054.8693

Review of the Handbook of Accounting, Accountability and Governance edited by Garry D. Carnegie and Christopher J. Napier

2024· article· en· W4405673591 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Szychta

Notice bibliographique

RevueZeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAccounting and Organizational Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccountabilityCorporate governanceFlourishingSocial accountingAccountingPolitical sciencePublic administrationSociologyManagement accountingManagementEconomicsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Handbook, edited by eminent professors of accounting Garry D. Carnegie (Australia) and Christopher J. Napier (the United Kingdom), was published by Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd in September 2023 in the “Research Hand-book on Accounting” series. This comprehensive publication (pp. 507 + XVI) is a compendium of knowledge on the interconnections between accounting, accountability, and governance. It includes an Introduction by the editors and 21 chapters authored by 45 specialists in the fields of accounting, accountability, and governance. The authors come from various countries, including the United Kingdom and Ireland, Australia and New Zealand, some Western countries of continental Europe (Finland, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain), as well as Canada, the United States of America, and Saudi Arabia. The general thesis of the entire collection of chapters is that “accounting, accountability and governance go beyond being technical practices to be learned, adopted and repeated, and must be studied as social and moral practices.” In turn, the purpose of the Handbook is to provide confirmation that accounting, accountability, and governance are interrelated “as three sides of a triangle”. The editors synthesized the links between these three social practices as follows: “accounting performs accountability, accountability nurtures governance, governance presumes accounting” (Carnegie, Napier, 2023, p. 1). According to the definition recently formulated by Carnegie, Parker, and Tsahuridu (2021, p. 69), accounting “is a technical, social and moral practice concerned with the sustainable utilisation of resources and proper accountability to stakeholders to enable the flourishing of organisations, people and nature.” They added: “Accounting is not a mere neutral, benign, technical practice” (2021, p. 72). This redefinition of accounting is applied by Carnegie and Napier (2023, p. 20). Accountability and the provision of useful information for decision-making by various stakeholders of an economic entity are the main functions of accounting. Mattessich (1995, p. 2) even stated that accountability is “the beginning and end of accounting.” He emphasized that the importance of accounting “lies in its function as a cybernetic mechanism (a feedback that controls and regulates) that preserves confidence in the trustees of public and private resources and financial markets no less than in the entire economic system” (Mattessich, 1995, p. 2). Accounting influences the actions and behav-iors of people, economic entities, and other parties in socio-economic and natural environments. While accounting is a technical practice, it is also a social and moral one, making it a multidimensional practice with the potential to shape a better world (see, for instance, Carnegie, 2023). Accountability means “the duty to provide an account (but by no means necessarily a financial account) or reckoning of those actions for which one is held responsible,” and it “involves two responsibilities or duties: the responsibility to undertake certain action (or forbear from taking actions) and the responsibility to provide an account of those actions” (Gray et al., 1996, p. 38). Accounting is a key device for the discharge of accountability both within and outside organizations (Carnegie, Napier, 2023, p. 19). An economic entity’s internal and external accountability requires periodic internal reports, financial statements and non-financial or sustainable development reports. Tradi-tionally, financial accounting and management accounting have been the primary traditional tools for providing information for these reports. The notion of governance dates to ancient times and it is of interest to political science and many social science disciplines. Accounting scholars, investors and regulatory bodies have developed a wide interest in corporate gov-ernance, especially since the early 1970s (Lai et al., 2023, pp. 28–29). “Corporate governance involves a set of relationships between a company’s management, its board, its shareholders and other stakeholders. Corporate governance also provides the structure through which the objectives of the company are set, and the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance are determined” (OECD, 2015, p. 9). The need for internal and ex-ternal (economic, social and environmental) accountability shapes the design, implementation and operation of corporate governance. Given the connections expressed above, the Handbook identifies three dimensions of accounting – technical, social and moral practices – as inherent to accountability and governance in this era of the concern for, and need to operationalize, sustainable development globally, particularly in alignment with the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (UN, 2015, p. 14). Highlighting the interconnectedness of accounting, accountability and governance is essential to achieving better outcomes for organizations, society and the planet.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,641
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,863

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZeszyty Teoretyczne RachunkowościMême sujetAccounting and Organizational ManagementTravaux en français237 207