Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The subject of this paper is the examination of the connection between national cultural characteristics and urban safety, i.e. the safest cities, rated as such according to the Safe City Index. Namely, cultural differences determine the different functioning of states in many fields, so academic literature on urban security often investigates whether and in what way cultural variables reflect on the resilience of cities, urban planning, urban development, etc. The theoretical basis of the paper is the theory of cultural dimensions, developed by Geert Hofstede. Therefore, this paper aims to determine whether and to what extent the dimensions of national culture, according to Hofstede, are present in the safety plans of the safest cities according to the Safe City Index and whether the high level of urban safety of the examined cities, also implies the similarity of the national cultures of the countries in which they are located. In the methodological sense, the paper is based on a content analysis respectively qualitative analysis of the safety plans of three selected cities - Toronto, Sydney and Barcelona. The selection was made on whether the highly ranked cities have a safety plan or strategy to make a comparison possible and whether there are findings about the cultural characteristics of the countries in which these cities are located, i.e. whether they are included in Hofstede's research. The analysis showed that similar cultural characteristics characterize the safest cities. Namely, these documents are characterized by inclusiveness, civil participation, and predominantly collectivist orientation, as well as focus on citizens' quality of life. At the same time, the identified cultural dimensions in their safety plans are similar to the established national cultural characteristics, according to Hofstede, for the countries where the given cities are located. Of course, cultural factors are only one of many that should be considered when studying urban safety. Still, there is no doubt that approaches of different societies to risk, uncertainty, prevention, safety and quality of life, are largely culturally determined. Although Hofstede's theory also has limitations, there are undoubtedly many reasons for studying urban safety through the prism of cultural values, considering the potential of Hofstede's model and the theoretical implications that can be reached.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».