Effects of a School-Based Physical Activity Intervention on Children with Intellectual Disability: A Cluster Randomised Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Importance Young people living with disability have poorer health outcomes than their typically developing peers. They are less physically active and at increased risk of chronic disease. Teacher-led, whole-of-school physical activity interventions are promising levers for population-level change, but are seldom tested among children with disability. Objective To evaluate the effect of a blended teacher-professional learning program (online and in-person) on fundamental movement skills among children with disability. Design, Setting, and Participants In this cluster randomised clinical trial, we randomised 20 government-funded primary schools, including 238 consenting students between Grades 2-5. Ten schools received the blended teacher-professional learning intervention and 10 received the control intervention. The professional learning was designed to support teachers as they implemented a whole-of-school intervention designed to enhance fundamental movement skills and increase physical activity levels. Recruitment and baseline assessments occurred in 2020. Research assistants, blinded to treatment allocation, completed follow-up outcome assessments at 21 months. Interventions The school-based intervention was mostly online learning for teachers, followed by one lesson observation from a project mentor and one from a peer. Between one and three teachers also met quarterly with the mentor to plan whole-of-school strategies to promote activity. Main Outcomes and Measures Test of Gross Motor Development-3 test of fundamental movement skill competency. Secondary outcomes were self-concept, enjoyment, wellbeing, 300-yard run time, and accelerometer-measured physical activity. Results We found no significant group-by-time effects for the primary outcome (fundamental movement skill competency: b = 1.07 [95% CI -3.70, 5.84], p = .658) or any of the secondary outcomes. About half the teachers assigned to the training completed the modules. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, a school-based intervention did not improve children’s fundamental movement skill competency or any other outcomes. Results may be attenuated by the disruptive effects of the COVID-19 pandemic due to reduced teacher participation and delayed post-test measurement. Alternatively, low intensity teacher-professional learning interventions may not be enough to improve motor competence or physical activity among children with intellectual disability. Key Points Question Does a blended-learning intervention for teachers improve fundamental movement skills among children with intellectual disability? Findings In this cluster randomised clinical trial of 20 schools and 238 children, a blended teacher-professional learning intervention did not improve fundamental movement skill competency at 21 months. Meaning Given similar programs increased outcomes among typically developing children, results of this randomised clinical trial suggest different models are needed to support children with disability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».