Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment and Changes in Neural Network Dynamics
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to synthesize the current literature on the association between chemotherapy (CTX) and chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) with functional and structural brain alterations in patients with noncentral nervous system cancers. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted, and results were reported following preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses guidelines. Data on study design, comparison cohort characteristics, patient demographics, cancer type, CTX agents, neuroimaging methods, structural and functional connectivity (FC) changes, and cognitive/psychological assessments in adult patients were extracted and reported. Study quality was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. Qualitative synthesis of cognitive and psychological testing outcomes, functional and structural connectivity changes, and their associations with CRCI were performed. RESULTS: From 11,335 records identified, 63 studies analyzing 3,642 patients were included. Study designs included 24 prospective studies, 1 retrospective study, 36 cross-sectional studies, and 2 longitudinal studies. Most studies (75%) focused on patients with breast cancer. Common neuroimaging techniques included functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging. Postchemotherapy, many studies reported structural and FC alterations in brain networks such as the default mode, central executive, and dorsal attention networks. Cognitive function was assessed in 56 of the 63 included studies. Of the studies examining specific cognitive domains, 64% reported worsened learning and memory, 56% found impaired processing speed, and 70% identified deficits in attention/working memory in patients after CTX. Of the studies examining associations between connectivity changes and worsened cognitive function, 72% reported significant correlations in postchemotherapy patients. However, most of these studies were of low evidence, while 45% of high evidence-level studies, including prospective cohort studies, did not find significant associations between connectivity alterations and cognitive impairments. DISCUSSION: While there is evidence suggesting CTX affects brain connectivity and neural network dynamics that can lead to cognitive difficulties, the findings are inconsistent. More robust and standardized research is needed to conclusively determine the extent of these effects and to develop targeted interventions for mitigating potential cognitive impairments in patients undergoing systemic treatment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».