Utilizing Digital Human Technology to Attract International Students and Promote K-beauty Bepartments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Korea is actively pursuing various initiatives to become a global leader in education that can meet the current demand for education and attract and nurture international talent to drive regional and institutional growth. Developed countries such as the U.S., U.K., Australia, Germany, and Canada are competing to attract international students to enhance their national competitiveness and secure talent from abroad. Korean universities are similarly focused on addressing the challenges posed by a declining school-age population and are increasingly targeting international students who can contribute positively to the local economy. The purpose of this study is to explore the use of digital human technology in attracting and promoting international students who wish to enroll in Korean universities to study K-beauty. To do so, we first analyzed the current status of international students in Korean higher education institutions based on statistical data from the Ministry of Education, Statistics Korea, Korea Educational Development Institute, Ministry of Employment, and Ministry of Justice, including the number of international students by course, discipline and region, country of origin and region, type of study abroad, university, and major, the share of international students in the world, the number of international students, and the status of improving the visa system for international students. In order to utilize digital hobnobbing technology to promote departments to attract international students, we utilized a tool provided by Klleon. From 2015 to 2022, the number of foreign students in domestic higher education institutions increased from 91,332 in 2015 to 166,892 in 2022. Four-year institutions accounted for 149,576 students, 89.6%, vocational colleges 8.7%, and graduate schools 1.7%, and by region, 58.2% were in the metropolitan area and 41.8% were in non-metropolitan areas. By country of origin, China accounted for 66,372 (43.6%), and Asia accounted for 90.8%. In terms of non-metropolitan areas, Busan, Daejeon, Chungnam, and Jeonbuk were found to be higher than other regions. By university, Hanyang University, Kyung Hee University, and Sungkyunkwan University were the top three, with humanities and social sciences accounting for the highest proportion. Although the share of international students in Korea has been slowly increasing, the share in 2020 was 2%, which is still lower than the OECD. For international students who complete their studies in Korea, employment after graduation is very low, and the Ministry of Justice is working to improve the system for international student visas. As the interest in digital humans in education is increasing, and the technical support for creating digital humans is getting cheaper, faster, and more convenient, it is expected that their use in attracting and promoting international students will increase. As the social interest in generative AI has recently increased and the field of digital beauty has been established as an academic field, it is predicted that the day may soon come when AI humans will be used in beauty education, so it is necessary for instructors to prepare for this.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».