System Integration and Verification Approach for Large-Scale Space Power Systems
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
When we define a large-scale system, a typical example would be a space development project. When we talk about large-scale systems in space development, there is the International Space Station (ISS), which was proposed by NASA in the 1980s as a manned space station, and which Japan, ESA, Canada, and later Russia joined as international partners. Japan's unique space transportation system, rocket development, began in the 1970s, and has a history of development of the H-1, H-2, and the new H-3, making it a largescale system promoted by Japan. In addition, the satellite carried on the third H-3 is called ALOS-4, which has an earth observation mission, and is a large satellite that weighs 3 tons and is 20 meters long when the solar paddles are deployed, so it can be said to be a large-scale system. In this paper, the author looks back on and explains the integration and verification of the International Space Station from development to operation, focusing on the development of large-scale space power systems, their integration, and verification. In addition, from a comparative perspective, the integration and verification of Japanese rocket development is compared with the ISS. The conceptual and basic design of the International Space Station began in the 1980s, and in-orbit assembly began in 1998. It is scheduled to be completed in 2011 and to end its role in 2030. Looking back at the history of the ISS, there are broadly a design phase, a development phase, and an assembly phase, and the operation phase began after in-orbit assembly began. In these phases, test verification and integration tests were conducted according to the phase at that time. The International Space Station, a large-scale space system, initially had an extremely high-risk assembly scenario in which elements and modules from each country were launched, connected in orbit, and element-to-element integration and verification tests were conducted for the first time. In this paper, the author describes how the problems and challenges of integration and verification of the International Space Station, an international collaborative program, have been solved, and attempts an overall evaluation of the development of such a large-scale system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle