A Maximum-Use Trial of Ruxolitinib Cream in Children Aged 2–11 Years with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ruxolitinib cream has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antipruritic activity and was well tolerated in a phase 3 study in patients aged 2–11 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). This study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and quality of life (QoL) with ruxolitinib cream under maximum-use conditions and with longer-term use. Eligible patients were aged 2–11 years with moderate to severe AD [Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score 3–4], and ≥ 35% affected body surface area (BSA). Patients applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream twice daily to all baseline-identified lesions during the 4-week maximum-use period, then to active lesions only up to week 52 (patients with ≤ 20% affected BSA from week 8). Safety was assessed by frequency and severity of adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed as secondary endpoints, and efficacy and QoL were exploratory endpoints. Overall, 29 patients (median age 5 years) were enrolled. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 9/29 patients (31.0%); there were no adverse events of special interest (i.e., no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboses) during the study period. Mean steady-state plasma concentration during the maximum-use period was below the known half-maximal inhibitory concentration of Janus kinase–mediated myelosuppression in adults. Reductions in affected BSA and IGA observed at week 4 were sustained with as-needed use through 52 weeks. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes and QoL measures were consistent with efficacy results. These results support the safety of ruxolitinib cream in children (2–11 years) with AD, including those with extensive disease, and are consistent with previous efficacy findings. NCT05034822, first registered 30 August 2021. Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% is approved in the USA for patients aged ≥ 12 years for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) involving ≤ 20% of the body, with recent studies supporting the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib cream in younger children with mild to moderate AD. Maximum-use trials look at the safety of treatments applied to more extensive areas of skin, assessing potential for side effects. This maximum-use trial assessed safety, absorption, and effectiveness of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream when applied twice daily for 4 weeks in children aged 2–11 years with AD involving ≥ 35% of the body. Patients then applied ruxolitinib cream as needed for ≤ 52 weeks, and safety and disease control were assessed. During the first 4 weeks, 31% of patients reported side effects. Only one patient experienced treatment-related side effects at the application site. As-needed ruxolitinib cream did not cause any other side effects of concern. The average ruxolitinib blood level during the first 4 weeks was low. As expected with low ruxolitinib blood levels, no side effects associated with oral drugs of the same class (e.g., low levels of white blood cells, serious infections, cancers, major cardiovascular events, or blood clots) were seen. AD lesions decreased in size and there was relief of itching during the first 4 weeks of treatment, and the amount of ruxolitinib cream applied decreased thereafter. Disease control was maintained for ≤ 52 weeks with as-needed ruxolitinib cream. These findings help to confirm the safety and effectiveness of ruxolitinib cream in children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».