Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Commercial Recreation Research: WoS Database Example (1986 - 2023)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study was carried out to reveal the structure of change and development by conducting a comprehensive research in the international literature on the subject of “commercial recreation” research. The dataset, which includes analytical data of academic articles on commercial recreation research reflected in the international literature for the years 1986-2023, was downloaded from the WoS database within the framework of the determined academic actors. The relevant data set was tested and analyzed in VOSviewer and Bibliometrix R Statistical Analysis Program. As a result of the performance analysis conducted on research, it was determined that the most academic articles were contributed to the international literature in the "English" language, in the year "2023", in the research fields of "Environmental Sciences Ecology" and in the "Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)" scanned index. In order to reveal the comprehensive social structure of the “commercial recreation” literature, tests were conducted on the analysis of authors, universities and countries in the context of co-authorship. In order to reveal the comprehensive conceptual structure of the relevant research topic, tests regarding keyword analysis were carried out in the context of common words. As a result of the tests and analyses; “Tyrvainen, L.” was found to be in the first place in terms of the number of articles and total link strength value, and “Cox, S.” was found to be in the first place in terms of the number of citations. It was determined that “Noaa” ranked first in terms of article, “Univ Calgary” ranked first in terms of citation count, and “Queensland Univ Technol” ranked first in terms of total link strength value. It has been determined that “USA” ranks first in terms of article, citation and total link power value. Within the scope of keywords; “management”, “recreation”, “conservation” were found to be in the first place in terms of usage numbers, and “management”, “conservation”, “perceptions” were found to be in the first place in terms of total connection strength values. It has been determined that the words “recreation”, “management” and “urban” are in the first place in terms of the number of uses in the titles of the relevant articles, and “commercial”, “recreation” and “management” are in the first place in terms of the number of uses in their summaries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,055 | 0,043 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».