Our Justice Journeys: Three Centuries of Striving for a Better World
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This compact volume, edited by Thomas Dobson, offers a richness in content that belies its length. Offering a range of papers reflecting on the ‘Walking with Micah’ social justice project that reported to the British Methodist Conference in 2021, it offers a fascinating insight into the sometimes unknown history of Methodist encounters with injustice arising from class, race, and sex.The focus is largely historical, reflecting the contributors’ and publisher’s concern with the heritage aspects of Methodism. Far from this rendering the subject irrelevant to the concerns of today, however, the focus on Methodist history suggests the importance of context and lived experience in the quest for a more just society. How previous generations of Methodists struggled with injustice in practical ways offers helpful reflections for how we might do the same.A striking element of the volume is the connection made between the struggle for justice in the lives of Christians and the various Methodist archives and heritage sites. These places range from the contents of the Methodist Women’s Collection at Epworth (in the article by Ruth Slatter and Hannah Worthen), to the New Room and its location in the struggles of John Wesley’s Bristol (described in Kate Rogers’s article), to Englesea Brook and the Primitive Methodist cultivation of the preaching of women and working-class men (illuminated in the pieces by Elizabeth Morris and Tim Macquiban). This emphasis on time, place, and personal history anchors the reflections of contributors on what it means to follow the God who requires us to ‘act justly and to love mercy’ (Micah 6:8) in our journey as Christians.That the past informs the present is implicit in the pieces offered. There is a keen sense of the role played by Primitive Methodists in shaping the social justice strand in contemporary Methodism. At a time when class is once again becoming a key political concern, not just because of the limits it too often places on individual opportunities, but also because of its role in the construction of identity and values, the discussion of the variety of backgrounds of several local preachers is particularly timely.This collection is at its most engaging in its refusal to offer self-congratulatory accounts of the Methodist pursuit of social justice. Slatter and Worthen’s reflection on the Methodist Women’s Collection does not shy away from the pain that accompanied the disbanding of Network in 2010 and its subsequent reemergence as ‘Methodist Women in Britain’ (34). That Slatter and Worthen engage with this and the significance of feminist archiving is much to their credit.To those who are not historians, there is much that speaks to today’s struggles for social justice. Jonathan Hustler’s concluding essay on ‘Methodist Justice Today’ is helpful in detailing the climate emergency and the tension encountered when attempting to navigate the way between engaging and disengaging with fossil fuel companies. A similar tension is reflected in the discussion of reparation for the continuing economic and social ramifications of slavery. What emerges is a keen sense of what it means to grapple with the very real, messy reality of creating a juster world. By focusing on the realities of past lives, the desire for overly simple solutions to complex and often systemic problems is challenged. The importance of coming alongside those struggling with the injustices of our age—listening, as Rachel Lampard argues, to those struggling with the reality of social suffering—may well challenge our own preconceptions of the conflict situations in today’s world. The Church’s prophetic voice is to be heard, not in peddling simplistic solutions to the world’s ills but through undertaking the painstaking work of standing alongside those whose lives might reveal to us what God is calling us to do, but also how God in their lives and experiences is at work in our world.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,034 | 0,043 |
| Communication savante | 0,035 | 0,021 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,018 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,016 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».