MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4406131006 · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1546283

Editorial: Journey through bariatric surgery

2025· editorial· en· W4406131006 sur OpenAlexaff
Mauro Lombardo, Tyler McKechnie, Aristithes G. Doumouras, Edda Cava

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Nutrition · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineWeight lossLiraglutideObesityPharmacotherapyVitamin D and neurologyIntensive care medicineSurgeryDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineType 2 diabetesEndocrinology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Bariatric surgery provides a significant benefit for patients with severe obesity and related diseases, but unfortunately not all the patients achieve the desired weight loss. Moreover, patients may experience a clinically relevant weight regain following a period of initial weight loss [3]. Candidates for BS should be admitted to a comprehensive clinical follow-up program pre-surgery and then followed for the years after. For those patients who can be defined as 'poor responders', a further step of treatment after BS may be needed, and pharmacotherapy could be the choice. As shown by Vinciguerra et al., 2023, Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists,was effective in the treatment of 'poor responders' to BS, showing benefits in reducing metabolic syndrome and improving body composition, highlighting how the integration of targeted drug therapies can enhance the effects of surgery in individuals with insufficient weight loss [4]. In the future, newly developed anti-obesity medications (AOMs) could aid in managing obesity and may be used as useful adjuncts for patients who do not experience the desired weight loss following BS.In parallel, the role of vitamin D as a preoperative biomarker has proven crucial for the prevention of post-operative complications. The study from Shang et al., 2024 found that patients with low 25(OH)D levels had a higher risk of post-surgical readmission, indicating the importance of appropriate screening before surgery and vitamin D supplementation to reduce postoperative risks and improve recovery [5]. The U-shaped relationship with 6-month readmission, suggests the importance of keeping the vitamin levels within the desirable range through individualized supplementation. Moreover, this study highlights the importance of a tailored choice to select patients and period of surgery, as shown by the surgery season related to 25(OH)D levels for the risk of readmission.Another example of the importance of considering vitamin deficiencies in patients undergoing BS is illustrated by a case of postoperative Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (Bento et al., 2024) [6]. Preoperative nutritional assessment and ongoing supplementation compliance are often underestimated after surgery, although they can lead to serious complications and generate potentially fatal neurological effects. It is evident that BS, although highly effective, requires rigorous nutritional follow-up to reduce the risk of complications and promote safe recovery with desired outcomes.In addition to clinical and nutritional screening, BS also requires a pre-operative psychological assessment. Indeed, outcomes depend not only on the surgical procedure, but also on the psychological well-being of patients, with elements such as anxiety, depression and personality traits profoundly influencing the maintenance of long-term outcomes. A cluster analysis identified two distinct psychological profiles among BS candidates: patients with high levels of depression and eating disorder symptoms; both of whom tend to have greater difficulty in maintaining stable weight loss. Rodolico et al., 2024 suggest that targeted psychological support, could reduce the risk of failure and improve long-term outcomes [7]. Taking these psychological factors into account during the preoperative evaluation is crucial for long-term success following BS.Another key to maintaining the benefits achieved after BS is a healthy lifestyle. Althumiri et al., 2023, stressed how a healthy lifestyle post-bariatric surgery is crucial for maintaining positive outcomes [8]. This comparative analysis of dietary and lifestyle habits between patients living with and without obesity following BS found that a protein-rich diet and reduced smoking were strongly associated with better outcomes and a lower risk of weight regain. This analysis confirmed the importance of encouraging healthy lifestyle habits as part of an integrated care pathway.In the end, the dysfunction of excessive adipose tissue encountered in obesity is confirmed by increased inflammatory biomarkers, possibly contributing to the development of obesity associated comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, among others.Biomarker research in this field is burgeoning. Vanin-2 is a biomarker that was highlighted by Geng and colleagues in this Research Topic [9]. Vanin-2 is a protein associated with inflammation of adipose tissue and insulin resistance, that has been shown also to be an effective predictor of BS outcomes. Geng et al., 2023 found that weight loss induced by sleeve gastrectomy resulted in a more significant decrease of Vanin-2 levels compared to weight loss after conventional dietary treatment. Therefore, monitoring Vanin-2 concentrations could help identify patients at risk of weight-loss failure, and to further customise post-operative management, with the ultimate goal of improving long-term outcomes.BS is only one step in the journey of managing patients with obesity, which requires a multidisciplinary and personalised approach to address each patient's challenges. This special issue highlights the importance of an integrated holistic care, including psychological support, in-depth nutritional assessments and continuous monitoring of inflammatory biomarkers. BS, more than an isolated intervention, is a journey to a healthier life, in which every clinical and psychological aspect plays a key role in ensuring sustainable results and a better quality of life.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,124

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,024
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,003
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0130,018
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0370,024

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in NutritionMême sujetBariatric Surgery and OutcomesTravaux en français237 207