Sequence-Defined DNA Polymers: New Tools for DNA Nanotechnology and Nucleic Acid Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Conspectus Structural DNA nanotechnology offers a unique self-assembly toolbox to construct soft materials of arbitrary complexity, through bottom-up approaches including DNA origami, brick, wireframe, and tile-based assemblies. This toolbox can be expanded by incorporating interactions orthogonal to DNA base-pairing such as metal coordination, small molecule hydrogen bonding, π-stacking, fluorophilic interactions, or the hydrophobic effect. These interactions allow for hierarchical and long-range organization in DNA supramolecular assemblies through a DNA-minimal approach: the use of fewer unique DNA sequences to make complex structures. Here we describe our research group’s work to integrate these orthogonal interactions into DNA and its supramolecular assemblies. Using automated solid phase techniques, we synthesized s equence-defined D NA p olymers (SDPs) featuring a wide range of functional groups, achieving high yields in the process. These SDPs can assemble into not only isotropic spherical morphologies─such as spherical nucleic acids (SNAs)─but also into anisotropic nanostructures such as 1D nanofibers and 2D nanosheets. Our structural and molecular modeling studies revealed new insights into intermolecular chain packing and intramolecular chain folding, influenced by phosphodiester positioning and SDP sequence. Using these new self-assembly paradigms, we created hierarchical, anisotropic assemblies and developed systems exhibiting polymorphism and chiroptical behavior dependent on the SDP sequence. We could also precisely control the size of our nanofiber assemblies via nucleation-growth supramolecular polymerization and create compartmentalized nanostructures capable of precise surface functionalization. The exquisite control over sequence, composition, and length allowed us to combine our SDPs with nanostructures including DNA wireframe assemblies such as prisms, nanotubes, and cubes to create hybrid, stimuli-responsive assemblies exhibiting emergent structural and functional modes. The spatial control of our assemblies enabled their use as nanoreactors for chemical transformations in several ways: via hybridization chain reaction within SNA coronas, through chemical conjugation within SNA cores, and through a molecular “printing” approach within wireframe assemblies for nanoscale information transfer and the creation of anisotropic “DNA-printed” polymer particles. We have also employed our SDP nanostructures toward biological and therapeutic applications. We demonstrated that our SNAs could serve as both extrinsic and intrinsic therapeutic platforms, with improved cellular internalization and biodistribution profiles, and excellent gene silencing activities. Using SDPs incorporating hydrophobic dendrons, high-affinity and highly specific oligonucleotide binding to human serum albumin was demonstrated. These structures showed an increased stability to nuclease degradation, reduced nonspecific cellular uptake, no toxicity even at high concentrations, and excellent biodistribution beyond the liver, resulting in unprecedented gene silencing activity in various tissues. Control over the sequence has thus presented us with a unique polymeric building block in the form of the SDP, which combines the chemical and structural diversity of polymers with the programmability of DNA. By linking these orthogonal assembly languages, we have discovered new self-assembly rules, created DNA-minimal nanostructures, and demonstrated their utility through a range of applications. Developing this work further will open new avenues in the fields of DNA nanomaterials, nucleic acid therapeutics, as well as block copolymer self-assembly.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».