Amyloid-β and tau deposition in traumatic brain injury: a study of Vietnam War veterans
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Traumatic brain injury is widely viewed as a risk factor for dementia, but the biological mechanisms underlying this association are still unclear. In previous studies, traumatic brain injury has been associated with the hallmark pathologies of Alzheimer’s disease, i.e. amyloid-β plaques and neurofibrillary tangles comprised of hyperphosphorylated tau. Depending on the type and location of trauma, traumatic brain injury can induce spatially heterogeneous brain lesions that may pre-dispose for the development of Alzheimer’s disease pathology in aging. Therefore, we hypothesized that a history of traumatic brain injury may be related to spatially heterogeneous amyloid-β and tau pathology patterns that deviate from the stereotypical temporo-parietal patterns in Alzheimer’s disease. To test this, we included 103 Vietnam War veterans of whom 65 had experienced traumatic brain injury (n = 40, 38.8% mild; n = 25, 24.3% moderate/severe). Most individuals had a history of 1 (n = 35, 53.8%) or 2 (n = 15, 23.1%) traumatic brain injury events. We included the group without a history of traumatic brain injury (n = 38, 36.9%) as controls. The majority was cognitively normal (n = 80, 77.7%), while a subset had mild cognitive impairment (n = 23, 22.3%). All participants underwent [18F]florbetapir/Amyvid amyloid-β PET and [18F]flortaucipir/Tauvid tau-PET 39.63 ± 18.39 years after their last traumatic brain injury event. We found no differences in global amyloid-β and tau-PET levels between groups, suggesting that a history of traumatic brain injury does not pre-dispose to accumulate amyloid-β or tau pathology in general. However, we found that traumatic brain injury was associated with altered spatial patterns of amyloid-β and tau, with relatively greater deposition in fronto-parietal brain regions. These regions are prone to damage in traumatic brain injury, while they are typically only affected in later stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Moreover, in our traumatic brain injury groups, the association between amyloid-β and tau was reduced in Alzheimer-typical temporal regions but increased in frontal regions that are commonly associated with traumatic brain injury. Altogether, while acknowledging the relatively small sample size and generally low levels of Alzheimer’s disease pathology in this sample, our findings suggest that traumatic brain injury induces spatial patterns of amyloid-β and tau that differ from patterns observed in typical Alzheimer’s disease. Furthermore, traumatic brain injury may be associated with a de-coupling of amyloid-β and tau in regions vulnerable in Alzheimer’s disease. These findings indicate that focal brain damage in early/mid-life may change neurodegenerative trajectories in late-life.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».