MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4406236744 · doi:10.5406/21558450.51.3.16

Cracks in the Outfield Wall: The History of Baseball Integration in the Carolinas

2024· article· en· W4406236744 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kate Aguilar

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Sport History · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAeronauticsEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chris Holaday's Cracks in the Outfield Wall begins with a baseball game, that of a Springfield-area team at a 1934 high school–age Legion tournament in Gastonia, North Carolina. Six teams were set to face off. American Legion baseball was a part of grassroots play that had the potential to feed into the National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues, a hierarchical and white professional baseball system that set guidelines for all the member clubs across the United States and Canada. When Springfield brought Ernest Taliaferro to play in North Carolina and the other teams refused to play them, the coach had the choice to sit his Black player or return home to Massachusetts. Coach Syd Harris, in agreement with the white players, chose the latter.Holaday's book does a masterful job of showing how America's game, whether grassroots or professional play, was defined by and often adhered to the racial hierarchy of US society. In the South, especially, this was known as Jim Crow, a formal set of laws that kept white and Black people apart socially and Black Americans as second-class citizens. And yet, the fact that some American Legion teams welcomed Black players, invited them to travel, and defended their right to play demonstrated that segregation in baseball and the US was not always so black and white.Cracks in the Outfield Wall focuses on three decades of baseball in North and South Carolina, from 1934 to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, to argue that the “end of that segregation did not come about suddenly.” It included “steps forward and setbacks” (ix). And, as every good sport history shows, it relied on actual people “brave enough to ignore Jim Crow laws who just wanted to make a living playing the game they loved” (ix). The result is a rich history of how regional baseball in its amateur and professional forms shaped the civil rights struggle. This history also challenges a master narrative of sport and American history, as American sportswriter Dave Zirin once said, as a tale of “segregation, integration, celebration.”1Holaday's work brilliantly reveals how complex the struggle for racial integration in the Carolinas was. As organized baseball initially adhered to Jim Crow, Black teams “barnstormed,” Black Cubans attempted to “pass,” and professional baseball grappled with its own relevancy in relation to the rise of television and air conditioning in the mid–twentieth century. What makes Cracks in the Outfield Wall so compelling is that Holaday gives nuance to civil rights history through regional play as well as challenges the framework of a traditional historical monograph. He provides thirty-two short chapters, each focused on a particular aspect of this integration history. While he does move chronologically through these decades, these vignettes invite the reader into both amateur and organized play to witness how racial integration occurred, segregation was upheld, and teams and Black players persisted as part of a national struggle.Throughout this incredibly well-researched book, which relies on Black and white sportswriting across the country, fans get a glimpse of names they know, such as Jackie Robinson, whose traveling team the Jackie Robinson All-Stars played in Greensboro and Charlotte, North Carolina, in 1949, fielding greats like Larry Doby, Don Newcombe, and Roy Campanella. By 1953, the team included four white players, thus forcing Robinson out of the lineup for games in Birmingham, Alabama, because Black and white athletes could not share the field. While Robinson received criticism for not outright challenging Jim Crow, Holaday observes that the choice to play drew nationwide attention to segregation in the South.Cracks in the Outfield Wall is filled with names familiar to many readers and many more that are perhaps less known. This includes the story of Percy Miller Jr., a recent high school graduate who was the first ballplayer to integrate professional baseball in North Carolina in 1950. He played for the Danville Leafs, located just across the state line in Danville, Virginia, for the Class B Carolina League. The Granite Falls Rocks, a part of the Class D Western Carolina League, quietly followed suit. Even so, by 1952, “in North Carolina there was not a Black player on the roster of any of the thirty professional teams playing in five different minor leagues in the state,” demonstrating how quickly integration came and went (41). It would take repeated investment from white and Black businessmen, coaches, and players to challenge the status quo, including segregated stadium seating.This book shows how the stakes of challenging the status quo proved different for amateur and professional play. Amateur play, without the backing of the major leagues, perhaps suffered most greatly, as is shown through the story of the 1954 Canon Street All-Stars, an all-Black Little League team in South Carolina. Despite the stance from Little League Inc. against racial discrimination, white teams seceded to avoid playing in an integrated tournament, forming Dixie Youth Baseball. Holaday argues that this history may explain why many Black youth in the state, and elsewhere, still choose to play football and basketball over baseball. It is an important nod to the more recent decline of African American ballplayers in what was once all of America's game.Cracks in the Outfield Wall is thus an important addition to the rich history of American baseball because it recognizes through regional and transnational play how local baseball decisions opened the door for national civil rights and for other Black men and women to excel in all sports. Each crack tells a more complicated story about what many mistakenly believe to be a floodgate with the signing of Jackie Robinson to the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1945. It is a critical regional roadmap for how to study and understand racial integration and the civil rights struggle more broadly, a reminder that the cracks let the light in.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,682
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,212
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Sport HistoryMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207