Neuroprognostication via Spatially-Informed Machine Learning Following Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Key Points Question Can machine learning be used to reliably and accurately predict 18-month developmental outcomes from neonatal brain MRI following perinatal hypoxic-ischemic injury (HIE)? Findings In this cohort study we show that across cognitive, language, and motor domains, a machine learning model can predict 18-month developmental outcome scores for neonates with HIE with excellent accuracy, and can produce atlases of the brain regions responsible for developmental impairments. Meaning Machine learning can be used for automated neuroprognostication in HIE, and may not only produce accurate predictions, but also provide neuroanatomical information that may prove useful in the search for novel interventions. Importance Perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the most common causes of neonatal death and neurodevelopmental impairment worldwide. Accurate prognostication of developmental outcomes following perinatal HIE is an important component of family-centered and evidence-based care. Objective To utilize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic measures together with machine learning to produce automated and objective predictions of developmental outcomes after perinatal HIE. Design This was a retrospective cohort study of infants born between January 2018 and January 2022 with HIE. Setting The data for this study were acquired at the neonatal neurocritical care unit of a quaternary care center based on the center’s institutional criteria for diagnosis and for the use of therapeutic hypothermia. Participants Neonates with a gestational age of ≥ 35 weeks and a diagnosis of neonatal encephalopathy. Exposure(s) Therapeutic hypothermia, with a whole-body cooling system, was begun within 6 hours after birth and was continued for 72 hours. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Brain MRI data were acquired on postnatal day 4-5, after rewarming after completion of therapeutic hypothermia. At 18-months of age, developmental outcome measures were assessed with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. We extracted radiomic measures from the deep-gray matter structures and from 2224 cubic tiles across the entire brain, in multiple modalities, and provided these measures to an elastic-net penalized linear regression model to predict the 18-month developmental outcomes. Results MRI-based radiomic measures from 160 neonates were used in a 10-fold cross-validation framework to predict the 18-month Bayley outcome scores. Across cognitive, language, and motor domains, the mean correlation between the predicted outcomes and the observed outcomes was 0.947, and the mean coefficient of determination was 0.879. Conclusions and Relevance A machine learning model using MRI-based radiomic measures from infants with HIE can reliably predict their 18-month developmental outcomes with excellent accuracy across the full range of motor, cognitive, and language domains. In addition, our approach allowed us to map the predictor weightings into neuroanatomical space, producing atlases of the brain regions responsible for the developmental impairments; these may prove useful in the search for novel interventions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».