The Effects of 5‐Aminosalicylic Acid on Janus Kinase Inhibitor Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editors, we read with interest the article by Nishida et al. [1] investigating the effects of aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) combined with tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. They found that concomitant 5-ASA use reduced the risk of relapse in patients on 5 mg tofacitinib BID, suggesting benefits at lower doses. Their findings are important to current clinical practice and future research; we have also performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the effects of 5-ASA combined with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors including tofacitinib and upadacitinib in UC patients. A total of 156 UC patients participated in this study between January 2020 and October 2024, including 66 (42.3%) women and 90 (57.7%) men. Among these patients, 42 were in tofacitinib 5 mg group, 42 were in tofacitinib 10 mg group, 42 were in upadacitinib 45 mg/30 mg group, and 42 were in upadacitinib 45 mg/15 mg group. Within our cohort, 64.9% of the patients in the tofacitinib 5 mg group and 76.2% of the patients in the tofacitinib 10 mg group received concomitant 5-ASA, 74.4% of the patients in the upadacitinib 45 mg/30 mg group, and 70.6% of the patients in the upadacitinib 45 mg/15 mg group received concomitant 5-ASA. The median disease duration was 1.2, 1.4, 1.2, and 1.5 years in the tofacitinib 5 mg with 5-ASA group, tofacitinib 10 mg with 5-ASA group, tofacitinib 5 mg, and tofacitinib 10 mg, respectively. The median disease duration was 1.3, 1.4, 1.2, and 1.1 years in the upadacitinib 45 mg/30 mg with 5-ASA group, upadacitinib 45 mg/15 mg with 5-ASA group, upadacitinib 45 mg/30 mg, and upadacitinib 45 mg/15 mg, respectively. According to the Montreal classification, the number of patients with E1, E2, and E3 was 36, 87, and 33. Table 1 presents the overall demographic characteristics and provides a detailed comparison between the groups using and not using 5-ASA in the JAK inhibitor group. There were no significant differences about C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, hemoglobin, and albumin among these groups. Of the 156 patients, 20 (12.8%) experienced clinical relapse, and 38 (19.2%) experienced endoscopic relapse at the follow-up of 6 months. Of these, 13.6% (6 of 44) of patients not using concomitant 5-ASA clinical relapsed, compared to 12.5% (14 of 112) of those using concomitant 5-ASA. A total of 25% (11 of 44) of patients not using concomitant 5-ASA endoscopic relapsed, compared to 24.1% (27 of 112) of those using concomitant 5-ASA. No significant differences were noted in the clinical and endoscopic relapse rates between patients using only JAK inhibitors and using JAK inhibitors with 5-ASA. At the same time, there were no significant differences about the clinical and endoscopic relapse rates between patients with tofacitinib and upadacitinib. In conclusion, our retrospective cohort study indicated that the concomitant use of 5-ASA cannot offers protective benefits when using JAK inhibitors to treat UC. However, further research is needed to confirm our findings and understand the mechanisms involved. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».