Factors influencing a hand-touch learning task outcome in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dog cognition research often requires dogs to meet initial screening and preliminary behavioural criteria to proceed with subsequent experimental task phases. Reasons for the excluded dogs’ inability to meet the criteria, especially in the absence of major stressors or procedural errors, remain uncertain, whether stemming from variations in cognitive capacities, reward motivation, or lack of specific experiences in dogs’ learning history. Our objective was to identify predictors of failure in an owner-administered hand-touch learning task, with the aim of highlighting the characteristics of dogs more likely to succeed in this specific task and the potential sampling bias this success may introduce to the final study populations in similar cognitive studies. A total of 150 pure-bred dogs performed a hand-touch learning task with their owners, using food rewards as a reinforcer. The task consisted of different phases, each necessitating the dog to fulfill specific criteria before progressing to the subsequent phase. Failure was defined as the inability to meet the specified task criteria after three days of attempting the task. Binomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the probability of failure, incorporating dogs’ demographic characteristics, training history, reward responsiveness, and impulsivity scores, along with factors specifying owners’ previous experiences with dogs as independent variables. indicated a higher likelihood of task failure associated with advancing age, lower food responsiveness scores, being a non-sporting dog, receiving non-food rewards in previous trainings, lack of familiarity with the hand-touch behaviour, along with a lack of dog training knowledge and a history of owning fewer dogs by the owner. While findings are specific to the hand-touch training and may not generalize to other types of canine cognitive tasks or broader contexts, they highlight potential selection biases in similar cognitive research, where certain groups of dogs may demonstrate a higher likelihood of success, and thus, be disproportionately represented. This possibility warrants further exploration across a broader range of cognitive tasks and contexts. • Older and less food responsive dogs are more likely to fail in the hand-touch learning task. • Dogs without relevant training experiences are more likely to fail in the hand-touch task. • Owners dog training knowledge and their prior experience with dogs may impact dogs’ learning outcome in the hand-touch task. • Canine cognition research employing similar tasks should consider potential biases favoring the performance of highly reward-motivated or experienced dogs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle