SHARE’s Impact on Medical Students Interested in Global Plastic Surgery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Surgeons in Humanitarian Alliance for Reconstruction, Research and Education (SHARE) is an innovative program from the Plastic Surgery Foundation designed to address global disparities in plastic surgery. SHARE uniquely provides medical students opportunities to learn about plastic surgery from a global surgery and cultural humility perspective. To refine our curriculum, we developed a survey to investigate current global and plastic surgery education among medical students who participate in SHARE and their attitudes toward SHARE’s current medical student engagement opportunities. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was designed to assess barriers to involvement in plastic surgery and global surgery, motivations for joining SHARE, SHARE’s impact in alleviating barriers to involvement in plastic surgery and global surgery, and whether medical students’ involvement in SHARE affected interest in pursuing a plastic surgery or global surgery career. The survey was distributed via listserv to medical students involved in SHARE as of February 2024. RESULTS: Thirty-seven out of 79 medical students completed the survey (47%). Forty-nine percent were between the ages of 26-30 years old and 49% were first-generation immigrants to the United States or Canada or were a member of a first-generation family. Racial and ethnic composition included: 32% White/Caucasian, 29% Asian/Asian American, 25% Black/African American, 11% Middle-Eastern/North African, and 4% preferred not to say. While most participants (81%) were interested in pursuing plastic surgery residency, 61% attended a medical school without an integrated plastic surgery program and 31% had never had an opportunity to discuss plastic surgery cases in any setting prior to joining SHARE. Among participants who had any previous global health involvement, only 44% of these global health opportunities focused on global surgery specifically. Primary motivations for participating in SHARE were to network with plastic surgeons, learn about the experience of surgeons outside of North America, and to learn more about global surgery. The activities that medical students participated in within SHARE that enabled exposure and involvement in global plastic surgery included: clinical assemblies (36%), small groups (27%), panel at Plastic Surgery the Meeting 2023 (23%), and serving on a subcommittee (14%). The majority of participants (57%) were more interested in plastic surgery after being involved with SHARE (p < 0.001). Ninety-three percent of participants stated that their interest in incorporating global surgery into their career was moderately or greatly increased after participating in SHARE, compared to 7% unchanged and 0% decreased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the critical role that SHARE plays in alleviating barriers medical students face regarding plastic surgery exposure and global surgery education. These results will be used to target opportunities to further optimize medical students’ role in the SHARE program.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».