Global Publication Trends and Research Hotspots of Diabetes and Osteoporosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Diabetes and osteoporosis, as chronic diseases with high incidence, have caused deep concern in the field of global public health due to their high morbidity and mortality. More importantly, the complex and close relationship between diabetes and osteoporosis has gradually become the focus of scientific research. It is very meaningful to carry out bibliometric analysis in the research field of diabetes and osteoporosis to describe the current international trend and present a visual representation of the past and emerging trends of diabetes and osteoporosis in the past decade. METHODS: In this study, the characteristics of the articles on "diabetes and osteoporosis" retrieved and downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database from January 1, 2011 to December 1, 2022 were analyzed by bibliometrics to clarify the evolution and theme trends between the two diseases. Citespace software was used for data analysis and visualization, including countries, academic institutions, journals, authors, subject categories, keywords, references, and citations. In addition, some important subtopics identified by bibliometric characterization were further discussed and reviewed. RESULTS: Finally, 3372 articles were included in the analysis, including a total of 96 countries, 407 organizations, 1161 journals, and 617 keywords. Articles related to diabetes and osteoporosis were first published in 2011 and then showed an increasing trend year by year. The United States, China, Italy, England, and Japan were the top 5 countries associated with the largest number of publications. University of California-San Francisco, China Medical University, University of Toronto, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Mayo Clinic were the top 5 academic institutions in terms of the number of published papers. The top 5 authors with the highest number of publications were William D, Ann V, Nicola, Peter, and Toshitsugu. Osteoporosis International has published 130 articles in this field, ranking first among highly productive journals. In addition to diabetes and osteoporosis, the most frequently used keywords were bone mineral density, obesity, and fracture. CONCLUSION: More and more studies have been conducted on diabetes and osteoporosis, and the current research mainly focuses on the pathogenesis of various chronic diseases. In the future, more attention may be paid to the prevention and management of these two chronic diseases and the production and application of new drugs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».