Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Becoming American in Creole New Orleans, 1896–1949, Darryl Barthé, Jr., has written a probing local history that is instructive for understanding the complexities of racial, ethnic, and cultural identities in both the modern past and present. Focused as it is on the process of “Americanization” engaged by New Orleans Creole communities (or descendants of gens de couleurs) through the late nineteenth and early-mid twentieth century, the book treats a vital era of urban development and transformation in the Big Easy. Much of this history is fragmentary, in terms of cross-cultural and caste relations in the context of the nadir of Jim Crow race and class relations as well as white supremacist racial violence and hegemony in US history.The book sets out to recount some of the methodological challenges of telling histories of Creole communities in polyglot states like Louisiana, bordered as they are on the Caribbean world but within the hegemony of American nation-making. Indeed, as Barthé, Jr., indicates, the “story of Louisiana Creoles in New Orleans is a convoluted one, because it is the story of an in-between people who do not fit neatly into the black and white American racial narrative” (2). Moreover, the “paucity of records” available for chronicling Louisiana's Creole community, “demanded that” the author “consult a variety of sources” (3), notably oral histories of his own family members—which he puts in “dialogue with archival sources to reconstruct historical contexts that have been heretofore inaccessible” (4).In many ways, this book seems like a work that would have been impossible without the insider status enabled by an author with family connections to the subject matter discussed. From the opening words, which recount a descendant's connections to New Orleans’ Plasterers Union (Local 93) profiled in Chapter 4, it becomes clear that the author seeks to interrogate the problematic biracial notions of race that often dominate American discourse in the modern era—obscuring the nuances and complexities of regional and community formations that vary over time and place. As such, the book works as an important corrective to other regional Louisiana (and perhaps US Southern) histories of civil rights and labor that have sometimes overstated the degree to which the state's diverse Creole communities, descended as they are from French and Spanish settlers as well as enslaved Africans in the Americas, fit into histories of resistance to American racism and White supremacy.A clear contribution of the work is to recall the clannish “sodalities” of Creole community formations (notably through ethnically organized benevolent societies and fraternal orders like the Jeunes Amis and the Francs Amis) in a city like New Orleans. These histories also featured the more prolific exploits and life journeys of early American jazz icons and pioneers like Jelly Roll Morton and Sidney Bechet, who were Creole in background. While New Orleans and Louisiana Creole artists were certainly at the center of America's history of jazz culture, Barthé, Jr., is sure to indicate how many “musical idioms,” while “adopted, refined, and expounded” by such Creole icons, were “in origin . . . African American, not creole” (69). Indeed, a major theme of the book is to point out the ways in which, ultimately, much of the history of Americanizing Creole New Orleans was set, sometimes violently through colorism, against potential solidarities with Black New Orleans through the era of civil rights in the mid-twentieth century. This was the case even though Black and Creole communities both grappled with the vagaries of Jim Crow (though in different ways, given the phenomenon of racial passing and related class privileges).The book proceeds chronologically and thematically from the French and Spanish colonial era through the nineteenth century epoch of American expansionism and colonization—largely charted in Chapter 1. It follows with two chapters on the ways Creole communities engaged with the decidedly American systems of “white supremacy” that were imposed by the late nineteenth century—an engagement that both divided and united the Creole community along lines of race, class, and ethnicity. As Barthé, Jr., indicates throughout the study, “Creole New Orleans was not a monolithic community” (80). The book also engages important histories of labor, education, and religion, to indicate the important ways Creole culture, French language, and Catholic religion have shaped the history of modern New Orleans, just as Creole communities came over time to be more “American” and Anglo in orientation.The book would certainly interest students of modern race, caste, class, and culture, just as it helps correct and sharpen important local histories of modern New Orleans when it comes to understanding the city's labor and civil rights solidarities across lines of class and caste.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».