Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 provides low-level cross-protection against common cold coronaviruses in mouse and non-human primate animal models
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The common cold coronaviruses are a source of ongoing morbidity and mortality particularly among elderly and immunocompromised individuals. While cross-reactive immune responses against multiple coronaviruses have been described following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and vaccination, it remains unclear if these confer any degree of cross-protection against the common cold coronaviruses. A recombinant fowl adenovirus vaccine expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (FAdV-9-S19) was generated, and protection from SARS-CoV-2 challenge was shown in K18-hACE2 mice. Vaccinated mice were also challenged with the common cold coronaviruses human coronavirus (HCoV)-OC43 and HCoV-NL63 by the intranasal route, and viral shedding and lung burden were reduced in these groups compared to unvaccinated animals. Histopathological analysis of lung tissues revealed significantly less inflammation and lower pathology scores in mice that received FAdV-9-S19 . Because no mouse model for the coronavirus HCoV-229E exists, we vaccinated and challenged cynomolgus macaques to evaluate cross-protection against HCoV-229E. Animals were monitored for clinical signs of disease and viral shedding. Infectious virus was detected in both groups throughout the course of infection; however, vaccinated animals showed reduced viral shedding at multiple time points after infection. Histopathological analysis of lung tissues following challenge also indicated a more moderate disease in the vaccinated animals. Therefore, vaccination with FAdV-9-S19 also provided a moderate cross-protection against HCoV-229E disease in the cynomolgus macaques infection model. Our study demonstrates that vaccination with a recombinant fowl adenovirus expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can provide a low-level cross-protection against beta- and alphacoronaviruses. These findings are important for the design of future pan-coronavirus vaccines.IMPORTANCEThe common cold coronaviruses are a source of ongoing morbidity and mortality particularly among elderly and immunocompromised individuals, and no vaccine is currently available. Cross-reactive immune responses have been described following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination; however, it remains unclear what degree of cross-protection they confer against the common cold coronaviruses. We demonstrate that both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses provide a low-level cross-protection, resulting in reduced viral load and pathology for the common cold coronaviruses OC43 and NL63 in mouse models. Additionally, we present a novel non-human primate (NHP) model of infection with the common cold coronavirus 229E, demonstrating that it mimics the disease observed in humans and can serve as a model for future vaccine studies, as cross-protection was also observed. This is significant as it suggests that current vaccines could provide a low-level protection against other coronaviruses and could serve as part of vaccination strategy against future novel coronaviruses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».