Supports and barriers to creating and implementing person-centred plans in the community care sector in Canada: A qualitative analysis of three perspectives
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The community care sector manages the delivery of health and social services in people’s homes and local communities. The sector supports individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, physical disabilities, and complex medical needs. Person-centred plans (PCPs) have been recognized as evidence-based practice across various care settings, however there is limited literature on the factors impacting this process. This study aims to identify the supports and barriers to creating and implementing PCPs in the community care sector. We partnered with PHSS, a not-for-profit community care organization based in Ontario, Canada. We conducted a total of 42 semi-structured interviews, 18 with persons receiving care (i.e., persons-supported) at PHSS, 1 with a family member of a person-supported, 11 with frontline staff at PHSS, and 12 with representatives from different community care organizations in Ontario, Canada. We asked participants about the PCP process at their organization, including relevant supports and barriers. We analyzed the data thematically, using a pragmatic, qualitative, descriptive approach. We identified four key factors impacting the creation and implementation of PCPs: (1) the health and capacity of the person-supported, (2) community care sector challenges, (3) integration across community care and health sectors, and (4) community connections, accessibility, and inclusion. Participants described how the health and capacity of the person-supported could impact the PCP process, particularly for individuals who were non-speaking or had difficulty communicating. Inadequate funding and staffing were described as community care sector challenges. Participants also described a need for increased integration with other sectors including acute care systems. Strong connections with the community were integral to implementing PCPs; participants also encountered barriers to inclusion and accessibility. The creation and implementation of PCPs is impacted by individual health and capacity, organizational funding and staffing, intersectoral integration, and broader community factors. These findings highlight the importance of addressing challenges through targeted intervention strategies designed to optimize PCP creation and implementation and ensure equitable outcomes across diverse populations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle