Closer to Washington, than Brussels? The Comparative Analysis of Grenland’s and Faroe Island’s Paradiplomacy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article presents a comparative analysis of paradiplomatic and Arctic strategies of Denmark’s autonomies – Greenland and the Faroe Islands. Given the growing uncertainty around the Arctic governance’s future and the related institutions, both Tórshavn and Nuuk are facing a new set of external threats and opportunities that differ significantly from the early 2010s, when the autonomies published their first foreign policy documents. While the 2022 Faroese document retained a regional Arctic focus, the 2024 Greenland strategy significantly increased the geographical and thematic range of partners and agendas compared to the 2011 document. Greenland in particular added special sections dedicated to relations with Canada, Iceland and the North-East Asia, while the 2022 Faroese document contains only a general thematic block related to international cooperation. While Greenland, as stipulated in the 2024 strategy, openly talks about the goals of gaining independence, the Faroe Islands chose to leave such ambitions outside the scope of the document. Geographically, the EU and individual member states occupy a larger place in the Faroese strategy, while Greenland, compared to the 2011 document, seeks to significantly expand cooperation with the United States and Canada. Nordic cooperation and belonging to the Norden space are not an end in itself for Greenland, but have value insofar as they generate tangible economic and practical gains for the autonomy’s development. However, Greenland and the Faroe Islands share the common interests regarding regional security, and both autonomous entities rely on de facto membership in NATO and do not seek to receive a special demilitarized or neutral status, despite them wanting to preserve low tension in the Arctic. The Danish autonomous territories’ main ambition is to play a more meaningful role in shaping and implementing national defense policy decisions, especially those concerning the construction of military facilities on their territory, as well as to be more engaged in the discussions and defense planning process at the NATO level. The conclusion is that in the near future the most acute conflicts in Denmark's relations with Greenland and the Faroe Islands will be connected with expanding autonomies’ external powers and paradiplomatic opportunities, while their scope of power and control over domestic politics and questions is already quite extensive and does not lead to significant contradictions. Under these conditions Denmark will face difficulties conducting a common foreign policy and be in command of the relations of the autonomies with the United States and the EU that consider enhancing cooperation with Greenland and the Faroe Islands to be an important element of their Arctic strategies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».