Understand and Find a Mechanism to Enhance the Power of App-based Food Delivery Riders in Thailand
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background and Objectives: To explore new possibilities for finding spaces that can support the opportunity for dialogue and exchange among food delivery workers on digital platforms, which will strengthen their collective efforts to demand rights for the group, instead of establishing a union that is not recognized by law. This is because food delivery workers are currently controlled by digital technology rather than working in traditional physical workplaces. In the case of Thailand, food delivery workers are not classified as employees with social protection rights and do not have the legal right to form a union or demand rights under labour laws. As a result, their voices are ignored, and they lack bargaining power to demand better working conditions. Methods: The study employed a method of reviewing relevant academic documents, gathering data on the environment related to app-based food delivery workers, and synthesizing this information to explore the possibilities based on the actual conditions experienced by individuals in this occupation. Results: Although digital platforms disrupt the working conditions of food delivery workers, they can also serve as new public spaces for fostering community and advocacy. These online spaces enable workers to share experiences, discuss challenges, and collectively push for better working conditions and labour rights. By facilitating open dialogue and mutual support, these platforms can strengthen their collective voice, empowering workers to advocate for changes in their work environment. Application of this study: Food delivery workers can increase their bargaining power for labour rights by utilizing online spaces, as these can be free spaces from hierarchical legal structures. This can lead to demands arising from the consensus of the food delivery workers in the online system, empowering their collective voice to negotiate and protect their labour rights with authorities. Conclusions: Establishing an online platform as a communicative space for food delivery riders is crucial for addressing the challenges they face, particularly their lack of bargaining power. This digital public space will serve as a vital forum for riders to share experiences, discuss common issues, and collectively determine goals, thereby fostering a sense of community and solidarity. By facilitating open dialogue and mutual understanding, such a platform empowers riders to advocate for improved working conditions and more labour rights. Ultimately, this participatory mechanism not only enhances their ability to negotiate with agencies but also strengthens their collective voice, promoting a sustainable and supportive work environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».