P0800 Efficacy of filgotinib in patients with ulcerative colitis refractory to prior biologics
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Filgotinib has shown promise for patients with moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) who are refractory to prior biologics. Given the need for effective alternatives in this challenging patients, this study examines the efficacy of filgotinib in biologic-refractory patients. Methods An observational, descriptive, ambispective, single-center study of 29 patients with active UC who were started on filgotinib 200mg/24h between October 2018 and May 2024. Clinical and biochemical variables analyzed: partial Mayo Score (PMS), endoscopic evaluation, fecal calprotectin (FC) and the adjuvant treatment-free response (corticosteroids or apheresis) at weeks 8, 16, 26 and 52. Other variables were also measured: disease characteristics, previous biologic treatments and concomitant use of corticosteroids and immunomodulators. Results The median age was 43 (IQR 32-53) years, 45% were women. The median disease duration was 7 (IQR 3-14) years. One patient smoked at the beginning of treatment, and ten were ex-smokers. 45% had extensive colitis (E3, according to Montreal classification), and 55% had left-sided colitis. In 13 patients, colonoscopy was performed prior to drug initiation, with 92% presenting an endoscopic Mayo score 2-3. The most unique feature of our cohort is the high refractoriness to previous biologic treatments. Only one patient was naïve to biologics, as he was not a candidate for anti-TNF due to a history of multiple sclerosis. Of the remaining 28 patients, the majority (97%) had failed anti-TNF treatment, 41% had also failed ustekinumab and 34% had failed vedolizumab. At the time of treatment initiation, 45% were receiving concomitant oral or intravenous corticosteroids. In terms of baseline disease activity, the median PMS was 6 (IQR 5-7), and the median FC was 2000 (IQR 1664-2000) µg/g. Median follow-up was 26 (8-52) weeks. At weeks 8, 16, 26 and 52, the clinical response (PMS reduction ≥2) and clinical remission (PMS ≤1) rates were 83%/45%, 80%/64%, 72%/56% and 62%/47%, respectively (image 1). There was a significant decrease in FC: 1124 (IQR 155-2000) µg/g, 860 (IQR 53-2000) µg/g, 187 (IQR 82-1107) µg/g and 165 (IQR 17-1910) µg/g at weeks 8, 16, 26 and 52, respectively. Adjuvant treatment-free response was 43% with an estimated Kaplan-Meier curve persistence of 48% at 1 year (image 2.1). During follow-up, filgotinib was discontinued in 7 patients, 4 of them in the first 8 weeks. Attached is the Kaplan-Meier curve for the persistence of Filgotinib (image 2.2) estimated at 72% at 1 year. Conclusion Filgotinib is effective in the treatment of biologic-refractory ulcerative colitis in selected patients, achieving a high clinical remission rate and significantly reducing the need for adjuvant treatment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».