P0605 Nutritional Therapy for IBD: a new non-profit organization that offers trusted, evidence-based information and novel resources on diet and nutritional therapies in IBD
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background There is a well-described need for credible resources on the role of diet in IBD, with many Internet and social media sources found to be unbalanced and misaligned with the evidence1,2. Nutritional Therapy for IBD (https://www.nutritionaltherapyforibd.org/) was founded in 2019 to enhance the well-being and health outcomes of children and adults with IBD by optimizing medical care through adjunctive evidence-based nutritional therapy. An overview of the characteristics of this organization’s online resources, web traffic, and user impressions are described. Methods Website performance metrics were collected via Google Analytics from Oct 31, 2023, to Oct 31, 2024, and an online survey was conducted for two weeks in Oct 24. Results The website fosters training and dissemination of knowledge of the role of diet and nutritional therapies in IBD and includes four main sections: dietary options for IBD, research database, information for patients and families, and tools for healthcare professionals. Over the study period, there were 453,103 visits and 151,588 active users from 10 countries, with an average of 3 visits per user. The top-engaged countries were the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, South Africa, and Australia (Figure 1). The most visited website sections included 1) Recipes, 2) The Crohn’s Disease Exclusion Diet, and 3) The low FODMAP diet for non-inflammatory symptoms (Figure 2). Of 81 users completing the survey, 80.2% were female, 35.8% were patients with IBD, 29.5% were healthcare professionals, and 13.6% were family members. Among healthcare professionals, 30.3% were registered dietitians, 21.2% IBD-specialized registered dietitians, and 12.1% IBD gastroenterologists. 91.4% of responders indicated the content was useful, with high scientific rigor (82.7%), and stated the content influenced how they viewed nutrition as part of IBD care (74.1%). The most valuable resources were research summaries (80.0%), resources for implementing nutritional therapies in daily life (73.8%), and detailed information on specific nutritional therapies (68.8%). Conclusion Internet users are clearly interested in and find it useful to have access to evidence-based information about dietary interventions for IBD. Scientific rigor combined with accessible language are distinctive features of Nutritional Therapy for IBD, developed to help healthcare professionals use the best available evidence to inform their practice and help patients make informed choices about nutrition. References 1.Fusco, S., Briese, K., Keller, R., et al. (2024). Are Internet information sources helpful for adult Crohn’s disease patients regarding nutritional advice? J Clin Med, 13(10), 2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13102834 2.Gkikas, K., Wan, M., Svolos, V., et al. (2024). YouTube as a source of information for food, diet-related items, and advisory comments for the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 30(3), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad076
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,126 | 0,050 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».