Parental travel behaviours, accompaniment, and children’s active transportation: A multi-site study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Children who engage in active transportation (AT) to and from school are more physically active than those who use motorized travel modes. We investigated whether parents' travel mode to school as a child, current travel mode to work, and parental accompaniment on the trip home from school are associated with their children's AT to/from multiple destinations. Grade 4–6 children (n = 1699, 55% girls) were recruited from urban, suburban, and rural schools in the regions of Vancouver, Ottawa and Trois-Rivières, Canada. Parents reported their current travel mode(s) to work, school travel mode as a child, and how many days they accompanied their child home from school. Children reported the number of active trips to/from various destinations they took over 7 consecutive days. Multiple imputation was performed to replace missing data. Generalized linear mixed models based on a negative binomial distribution were used to investigate predictors of AT. Models were stratified by gender and adjusted for child age, parent respondent's gender, level of urbanization, and school-area socioeconomic status. For each day a parent accompanied their child home from school, girls participated in 6% less active trips (95% CI 0.91–0.97) while boys had 7% less active trips (95% CI 0.90–0.96). Boys living in Vancouver and Trois-Rivières had respectively 55% (95% CI 1.13–2.04) and 33% (95% CI 1.00–1.77) more active trips compared to Ottawa. Parent's work travel mode and school travel mode as a child were not independently associated with their child's number of AT trips. Children may have more opportunities for AT if their parents allow them to come home from school unaccompanied. These findings underscore the need for promoting children's independent mobility. • We examined associations between parents' and children's travel behaviours. • We assessed children's active transportation to/from school and many other places. • Parental accompaniment from school to home was associated with fewer active trips. • Parents' travel mode was not associated with their child's number of active trips. • Findings highlight a need for policies and programs to support independent mobility.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».