Effects and costs of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination of Belgian children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pneumococcal vaccination of children i FOREWORDVaccinations are an extremely successful chapter in the history of medicine Since the first experiments performed by Jenner in the late 18 th century with cowpox, many serious infectious diseases have been combated through vaccinations.In 1980 the world could even be declared 'free from smallpox'.Part of this success was explained through a unique feature of vaccination as a technique, the fact that also non-vaccinated individuals are protected since the germ becomes less prevalent in the environment, the so-called ' herd immunity' .Vaccination used to be save, efficient and cheap and the number of infectious diseases for which vaccination became routine has grown in recent years.Consequently, questions about the advisability of the introduction of new vaccinations were seldom asked: if it did the job it needed to be done.Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) are bacteria that are often present in the upper airways in children and adults and that do not necessarily lead to disease.They can, however, cause serious diseases such as pneumonia, meningitis or sepsis but more often they will lead to less serious disorders such as ear-or upper respiratory tract infections.But, the less frequent severe infections are potentially lethal and can occasionally lead to serious neurological damage.The incidence of pneumococcal disease is strongly age-dependent and at risk are mainly children up to the age of 5 and adults aged 65 and over.At the moment a pneumococcal vaccine for young children came to the market in Belgium, the question was raised whether this should be included into routine vaccination schedules.The vaccine might be efficient but is also expensive.At this moment the complete vaccination scheme with 4 injections costs over 250 € per child, a cost paid by the parents or partly reimbursed by the sick fund.To evaluate whether universal vaccination of newborns would be appropriate usage of available means, and how this vaccination should be implemented, the KCE was asked to conduct a health technology assessment (HTA).The outcome of this evaluation was uncertain: earlier economic evaluations disagreed, local determinant had to be included as was the effect of ' herd immunity', and to obtain reliable estimates for Belgium using local data was essential.This report is the result of an intensive cooperation of several partners and was conducted under important time constraints.These constraints, however, were not allowed to interfere with quality.Considering the anticipated arrival of several new vaccines in the near future this report might be a trendsetter.We hope this report will help policymakers to use available resources effectively, using a rational health economic approach.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».