Traffic flow modelling of vehicles on a six lane freeway: Comparative analysis of improved group method of data handling and artificial neural network model
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
• Mathematical model for South African freeway using real-time data to analyze traffic conditions. • Group method of Data Handling shows better fit to observed data, outperforming Artificial neural network in predicting traffic flow patterns. • Group method of Data Handling reduces model complexity, improves computing performance, and maintains efficiency. In recent decades, traffic flow modelling has become increasingly significant for improving road transportation systems and mitigating congestion on freeways. This research presents a comparative analysis of two machine learning methodologies—Improved Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—for modelling vehicular traffic flow on a six-lane freeway. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy and efficacy of both models in replicating complex traffic patterns and to provide insights into their suitability for real-time traffic flow applications. Traffic flow data were obtained from a six-lane freeway during off-peak and on-peak hours using South African road transportation systems as a case study. Traffic flow variables, such as vehicle density, speed, time, and traffic volume, were considered as both inputs and outputs. The models were trained and validated using this dataset, and the GMDH and ANN were assessed according to their regression efficacy R 2 and MSE. The results indicate that both models can effectively capture the nonlinear relationships present in the traffic flow of vehicles on a six-lane freeway. However, GMDH outperformed ANN in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. The optimal regression values for GMDH and ANN were 0.99372 and 0.9167, respectively, demonstrating that GMDH provided a substantially superior fit to the observed data. The exceptional efficacy of the GMDH is attributed to its self-organising architecture and capacity to autonomously identify the most pertinent inputs, thereby reducing model complexity and enhancing generalisation. Artificial Neural Networks, while efficient, require comprehensive tuning and may experience overfitting in high-dimensional datasets. This study suggests that GMDH is a more reliable and effective model for modelling traffic flow on a six-lane freeway, presenting opportunities for real-time traffic prediction and traffic flow management applications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle