MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4406877722 · doi:10.57598/r331c

How to better tackle Elder Abuse in Belgium?

2020· book· en· W4406877722 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Céline Ricour, Anja Desomer, Céline Pouppez, Célia Primus-de Jong, Imgard Vinck

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueElder Abuse and Neglect
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésElder abusePsychologyMedicineEnvironmental healthSuicide preventionPoison control

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

SCIENTIFIC REPORT 30 -- CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 30 -- 1 CONTEXT AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTION 30 -- 2 SCOPE, OBJECTIVES AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 32 -- 3 METHODOLOGY 33 -- 4 DEFINITIONS 33 -- 4.1 Elder abuse 33 -- 4.2 Older person 34 -- 5 DIFFERENT TYPES OF ELDER ABUSE 35 -- 6 INFORMAL CAREGIVERS AND DERAILED CARE 37 -- 7 CAUSE AND RISK FACTORS OF ELDER ABUSE 38 -- 7.1 Risk factors related to the person 38 -- 7.2 Risk factors related to the family environment 39 -- 7.3 Risk factors related to the society system 39 -- 7.4 Risk factors related to the institution 40 -- 7.5 Protective factors 40 -- 8 CONSEQUENCES OF ELDER ABUSE 40 -- 9 PREVALENCE OF ELDER ABUSE 41 -- 9.1 In general 41 -- 9.2 In Belgium 41 -- 10 DIFFERENT STEPS IN THE TACKLING OF ELDER ABUSE 44 -- 10.1 Prevention 44 -- 10.2 Detection 44 -- 10.3 Intervention 44 -- 11 EVIDENCE ON ELDER ABUSE INTERVENTIONS 45 -- CHAPTER 2: BELGIAN CONTEXT 47 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 47 -- 2 METHODOLOGY 48 -- 3 POLITICAL AUTHORITIES INVOLVED IN POLICIES AGAINST ELDER ABUSE 48 -- 3.1 Health care and social security competences 48 -- 3.2 Justice competences 49 -- 3.3 Security competences 49 -- 3.4 Welfare competences 50 -- 4 LEGAL FRAMEWORK PROTECTING ELDERS AGAINST ABUSE 50 -- 4.1 Repressive responses 51 -- 4.2 Preventive measures 62 -- 5 DUTY TO PROVIDE AID AND PROFESSIONAL SECRECY 68 -- 5.1 Everyone has a duty to assist a person in great danger 68 -- 5.2 .even holders of a professional secrecy 70 -- 5.3 Professional secrecy 70 -- 5.4 .and exceptions thereto 71 -- 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES INVOLVED IN ELDER ABUSE MANAGEMENT 82 -- 6.1 The main actors involved in the management of elder abuse in Flanders 83 -- 6.2 The main actors involved in the management of elder abuse in Wallonia 94 -- 6.3 The main actors involved in the management of elder abuse in Brussels 98 -- 6.4 The main actors involved in the management of elder abuse in German-speaking community 106 -- 7 ACTION PLANS, GUIDELINES AND GOOD PRACTICES RELATED TO THE PREVENTION OF ELDER ABUSE IN FLANDERS, WALLONIA AND BRUSSELS 109 -- 7.1 Awareness campaigns for the public 109 -- 7.2 Professional awareness and training 109 -- 7.3 Informal caregiver support 110 -- 7.4 Policies and practices in residential care facilities and home care 115 -- 7.5 Programmes to decrease societal attitudes and stereotypes towards older people: empowerment of older people. 118 -- 7.6 National, subnational or local policies and/or action plans related to elder abuse 121 -- 8 CONCLUSION 125 -- CHAPTER 3: ELDER ABUSE PREVENTION 128 -- 1 RATIONALE AND CONTEXT 128 -- 2 METHODOLOGY 129 -- 3 LIMITATIONS 129 -- 4 CATEGORIES OF PREVENTIVE ACTIONS 130 -- 5 PREVENTIVE ACTIONS AT THE INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LEVEL 130 -- 5.1 Elder abuse preventive strategies worldwide 130 -- 5.2 Elder abuse preventive strategies in Europe 136 -- 5.3 Summary of the international data about the preventive strategies 146 -- 6 OVERVIEW OF PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN 3 DIFFERENT COUNTRIES 149 -- 6.1 The Netherlands 149 -- 6.2 Québec (Canada) 153 -- 6.3 France 159 -- 7 INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON 167 -- 7.1 EA prevention: power levels and action plans 167 -- 7.2 EA prevention: policies in residential care facilities 168 -- 7.3 EA prevention: training professionals 169 -- 7.4 EA prevention: sensitisation campaigns for a broad public 169 -- 7.5 EA prevention: support to informal caregivers 170 -- 7.6 EA prevention: fighting ageism and empowering elders 170 -- CHAPTER 4: INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW OF STEP-BY-STEP PLANS IN CASE OF SUSPICION OF ELDER ABUSE 172 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 172 -- 2 METHOD 172 -- 3 CONTEXT OF STEP-BY-STEP PLANS IN CASE OF ELDER ABUSE SUSPICION IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES 173 -- 3.1 Australia 173 -- 3.2 Canada 177 -- 3.3 France 182 -- 3.4 The Netherlands 183 -- 3.5 UK 185 -- 3.6 USA 185 -- 3.7 Belgium 189 -- 4 SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE STEP-BY-STEP PLANS ON SPECIFIC TOPICS 190 -- 4.1 Australia 190 -- 4.2 Canada 191 -- 4.3 France 191 -- 4.4 The Netherlands 191 -- 4.5 UK 191 -- 4.6 USA 192 -- 4.7 Belgium 192 -- 5 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 192 -- CHAPTER 5: CLINICAL TOOLS FOR THE DETECTION OF ELDER ABUSE 194 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 194 -- 2 METHODOLOGY 194 -- 2.1 Search for systematic reviews 195 -- 2.2 Search for primary studies 195 -- 2.3 Psychometric assessment 195 -- 3 SEARCH RESULTS 197 -- 3.1 Systematic reviews 197 -- 3.2 Primary studies 198 -- 4 CLINICAL TOOLS FOR THE DETECTION OF ELDER ABUSE 198 -- 4.1 Comprehensive detection tools 199 -- 4.2 Tools on specific types of abuse 207 -- 4.3 Tools detecting the caregiver as abuser 212 -- 4.4 Tools for specific settings 216 -- 4.5 An example of a full detection procedure 218 -- 5 DISCUSSION 219 -- 6 BELGIAN PERSPECTIVE 221 -- CHAPTER 6: LIME SURVEY 223 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 223 -- 2 METHODOLOGY 223 -- 3 RESULTS 225 -- 3.1 Characteristics of the respondents 225 -- 3.2 Detection of elder abuse 228 -- 3.3 Evaluation of the urgency 245 -- 3.4 Intervention 246 -- 3.5 Good practices 257 -- 3.6 Reference person 257 -- 3.7 Contact 258 -- 3.8 Involvement of the elder in decision-making 266 -- 3.9 Personal stories 267 -- 3.10 Ideas to improve the management of elderly abuse 267 -- 4 DISCUSSION 272 -- CHAPTER 7: POLICE AND JUSTICE 275 -- 1 OPINIONS OF THE POLICE AND JUSTICE SECTORS IN PREVENTION, DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF ELDER ABUSE: AN EXPLORATORY QUALITATIVE STUDY BY INTERVIEWS 275 -- 2 METHODS 275 -- 3 RESULTS FROM THE INTERVIEWS 276 -- 3.1 Police stakeholders’ opinion 276 -- 3.2 Justice stakeholders’ opinion 287 -- 3.3 Chain approach and Family Justice Centers 303 -- 4 CONCLUSION 306 -- 4.1 Key messages 308 -- CHAPTER 8: STAKEHOLDERS AND EXPERTS CONSULTATION ON SPECIFIC ISSUES 314 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 314 -- 2 METHOD 314 -- 2.1 Experts and specialised stakeholders consultation in discussion groups 314 -- 2.2 Acceptability on and feasibility of solutions according to experts and specialised stakeholders 314 -- 3 PROBLEMATIC POINTS FROM PREVIOUS CHAPTERS 315 -- 4 EXPERTS AND SPECIALISED STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION IN DISCUSSION GROUPS 316 -- 4.1 Groups description 316 -- 4.2 Statements 317 -- 4.3 Conclusion about the opinion of experts and specialised stakeholders 317 -- 5 ACCEPTABILITY ON AND FEASIBILITY OF SOLUTIONS ACCORDING TO EXPERTS AND MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS 322 -- 5.1 Survey responses 322 -- 5.2 Characteristics of the respondents 324 -- 5.3 Step-by-step plan in case of suspicion of elder abuse 325 -- 5.4 Centralised contact point 330 -- 5.5 Professional secrecy and inter-sectoral consultation 334 -- 5.6 Decisional autonomy 337 -- 5.7 Training 339 -- 5.8 Awareness 342 -- 5.9 Quality of care 344 -- 5.10 Detection tools 347 -- 5.11 Reference person 348 -- 5.12 Coordination and interaction during the long-term management of elder abuse 350 -- 6 CONCLUSION 352 -- 6.1 Complying with the obligation to follow a step-by-step plan in case of suspected abuse 352 -- 6.2 Centralised contact point in case of elder abuse 352 -- 6.3 Professional secrecy and inter-sectoral concertation 353 -- 6.4 Decisional autonomy and involvement of the older adult 353 -- 6.5 Training 354 -- 6.6 Awareness and prevention 354 6.7 Quality of care 355 -- 6.8 Detection tools 356 -- 6.9 Reference person 356 -- 6.10 Coordination and interaction during the management of elder abuse 356 -- 6.11 Role of eerste lijn zone and SISD 357 -- 6.12 Emergency accommodation 357 -- APPENDICES 358 -- CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 358 -- APPENDIX 1. DEFINITION OF ELDER ABUSE IN THE LITERATURE 358 -- APPENDIX 2. STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE FOR THE RISK FACTORS 360 -- APPENDIX 3. DETAILS ON THE BELRAI 361 -- APPENDIX 4. EVIDENCE-BASED DATA ON ELDER ABUSE UP-DATED TILL APRIL 2020 BY THE RESEARCH CHAIR ON ELDER ABUSE, UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE, QUÉBEC. 362 -- CHAPTER 2: BELGIAN CONTEXT 368 -- APPENDIX 5. HIGHLIGHTS ON THE COMPETENCES EXERCIZED BY THE FEDERATED ENTITIES IN BELGIUM 368 -- APPENDIX 6. OVERVIEW OF THE STEPS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 369 -- CHAPTER 3: ELDER ABUSE PREVENTION 374 -- APPENDIX 7. DEFINING EA PREVENTION 374 -- APPENDIX 8. SCIENTIFIC REVIEWS ILLUSTRATING THE LACK OF EVIDENCE IN THE PREVENTION OF EA 375 -- APPENDIX 9. EXAMPLES OF EA PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES 376 -- APPENDIX 10. BELGIUM REPORT ON VIOLENCE PREVENTION 378 -- APPENDIX 11. REVIEW OF VARIOUS CASES IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 379 -- APPENDIX 12. EXTRACTS FROM THE EUROPEAN CHARTER OF THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF OLDER PEOPLE IN NEED OF LONG-TERM CARE AND ASSISTANCE 381 -- APPENDIX 13. DESCRIPTION OF THE ‘BREAK THE TABOO’ PROJECTS 386 -- APPENDIX 14. LAW OF QUÉBEC COMBATTING ABUSE AGAINST SENIORS AND VULNERABLE ADULTS 388 -- APPENDIX 15. LAWS IN CANADA AND QUÉBEC CONCERNING ELDER ABUSE 390 -- APPENDIX 16. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TOOLS DEVELOPED BY THE STRUCTURES RÉGIONALES D'APPUI À LA QUALITÉ DES SOINS ET À LA SÉCURITÉ DES PATIENTS 394 -- APPENDIX 17. COMPARATIVE TABLE OF PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN 3 COUNTRIES 396 -- APPENDIX 18. COMPARATIVE TABLE OF PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN BELGIUM 400 -- CHAPTER 4: INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW OF STEP-BY-STEP PLANS IN CASE OF SUSPICION OF ELDER ABUSE 405 -- APPENDIX 19. ELDER ABUSE POLICIES AND GUIDELINES IN AUSTRALIA 405 -- APPENDIX 20. AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL PLAN 406 -- APPENDIX 21. ACT STEP PLAN 407 -- APPENDIX 22. NSW STEP PLAN 408 -- APPENDIX 23. QUEENSLAND’S STEP PLAN FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 409 -- APPENDIX 24. QUEENSLAND’S INFO FOR NON HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 410 -- APPENDIX 25. EXAMPLE OF STEP-BY-STEP PLAN IN VICTORIA STATE 411 -- APPENDIX 26. VICTORIAN INTERAGENCY RESPONSE FRAMEWORK 412 -- APPENDIX 27. ELDER ABUSE PROTOCOL OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA 413 -- APPENDIX 28. FACT SHEET TO RESPOND TO ELDER ABUSE CONCERNS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA 414 -- APPENDIX 29. TASMANIA INTERAGENCY RESPONSE FRAMEWORK 415 -- APPENDIX 30. INTERVENTION AND REFERRAL FRAMEWORK IN TASMANIA 416 -- APPENDIX 31. ADVICES GIVEN TO ELDERS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF CANADA IN CASE OF ABUSE 417 -- APPENDIX 32. THE ACT AGAINST ELDER ABUSE IN QUÉBEC 418 -- APPENDIX 33. STEP PLAN IN CASE OF CONCERN ABOUT ELDER ABUSE IN QUÉBEC 419 -- APPENDI

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetElder Abuse and NeglectTravaux en français237 207